It's for the "Ninth Circuit" but maybe she's there too. She's everywhereThat document still has that compromised judge’s name on it.
It's for the "Ninth Circuit" but maybe she's there too. She's everywhereThat document still has that compromised judge’s name on it.
Yeah, FTC was extremely stupid to allow this, but she’s even worse for not voluntarily recusing herself. She shouldn’t have even asked if it was ok to stay, judges have recused themselves for far lessGet her the fuck out! She is obviously biased. Aren’t there laws for conflicts of interest? This is an obvious conflict of fucking interest. Why does no one point this out? Better yet, WHO appoints these judges in the first place? Microsoft?
Get her the fuck out! She is obviously biased. Aren’t there laws for conflicts of interest? This is an obvious conflict of fucking interest. Why does no one point this out? Better yet, WHO appoints these judges in the first place? Microsoft?
Everything after page 20 is evidence, which includes the original ruling, which is where the judge's name is found. She isn't the one ruling on this.That document still has that compromised judge’s name on it.
Magistrates are appointed by private majority vote of the federal district judges of the district they serve. Those judges, in turn, are appointed by the president and confirmed by the senate. Each district's judges also independently set how their district will handle assigning cases to magistrate judges. You can read more on it here, since you seem very curious about it but unwilling to actually look for answers rather than yelling out "who does this?"Who appoints or chooses these judges for these cases? WHO?
too bad the "fighters" are:I am tired too. But it is better to fight than the alternative.
That was my big surprise…Guess the FTC might have a shot after all. Also heard they held back on other documents for the trail.
I wish them the best of luck but for goodness sake, get a couple of better lawyers next time. They've got all the info & data they need to win, but lawyers who can't put two & two together won't get the job done.
Its pretty clear this cuco its a alt of someone banned in the pastThis guy ^ is xbox astroturfer? What do u guys think?
Who the f*** care if he want to destroy xbox lol? This is Playstation-centric forum, the safe haven of Playstation fans and xbox haters, and you had no place in this forum xbotz sucker .lol no. Just because you're in favor of the deal doesn't make you a "astroturfer." Use your brain more. Also you're the same guy that said you want to nuke Xbox headquarters' and put a gun in phil spencer mouth lmao. You're a lunatic lol.
This forum is for everyone, people here are allowed to be "on the other side" and if you don't like that you can go suck eggs.Who the f*** care if he want to destroy xbox lol? This is Playstation-centric forum, the safe haven of Playstation fans and xbox haters, and you had no place in this forum xbotz sucker .
The problem is American retirement funds are tied to stock market performance. Working against the interests of trillion dollar corpos, to which a lot of those funds are allocated, is inherently an act against your own best interests. An MS monopoly is preferable from that perspective, especially if it comes at the expense of foreign or smaller businesses.
For everyone my a**, tell that to xbotz sucka who just got fully deserved ban LMFAO. Justice always prevail, and the sun will always shine on our Playstation land no matter what's the evil obstacles are(m$ LOL).This forum is for everyone, people here are allowed to be "on the other side" and if you don't like that you can go suck eggs.
yeah, i can agree. if you are not bot, copy paste for the same shit 100th time, you gonna be okey. most of the bans for people who post the same shit for 100s of times. so you can't be even sure, if it is real person or actual bot.This forum is for everyone, people here are allowed to be "on the other side" and if you don't like that you can go suck eggs.