Grand Theft Auto VI

[Shmunter]

It' entirely possible they witheld the 60 fps mode to sell it later on.

But it's more thab likely they wanted the detailed world at the cost of performance.

RDR2 is incredibly detailed and has no 60 FPS patch, free or paid.

And rdr2 looks stunning at 60 on a JB PS5. It’s literal legacy vandalism for Rockstar to never patch it. Don’t trust them.

 

[Vertigo]

I mean… 30fps is a big deal. I would never trade post processing blur effects and Vaseline filters for image quality and frame rate. The faster the frame rate the better things look anyway. Still images mean absolutely zero.

It’s sorta unacceptable these days. But rockstar will get away with it.

Yes: I’d much rather see cpu driven aspects of the game nuked for better frame rate. Easy choice

BUT the game has a like a 20 year lifespan. It’s meant for future platforms anyway.

 

[Bo_Hazem]

And rdr2 looks stunning at 60 on a JB PS5. It’s literal legacy vandalism for Rockstar to never patch it. Don’t trust them.

Rockstar worshippers don't seem to play many open world games.

 

[Prometheus]

I mean… 30fps is a big deal. I would never trade post processing blur effects and Vaseline filters for image quality and frame rate. The faster the frame rate the better things look anyway. Still images mean absolutely zero.

It’s sorta unacceptable these days. But rockstar will get away with it.

Yes: I’d much rather see cpu driven aspects of the game nuked for better frame rate. Easy choice

BUT the game has a like a 20 year lifespan. It’s meant for future platforms anyway.

ITT people admit they prefer higher framerates but will defend 30FPS because of fanboyism or some shit.

 

[Vertigo]

Rockstar worshippers don't seem to play many open world games.

Id imagine most of the fandom these days are actually for the online game since it’s been driving sales for the last decade.

So how big this launch is without online is … wait for online — it will grow exponentially. It’s gonna end up being the first super major second life experience for many.

And obvious statement … GTA IS A SERVICE GAME

 

[Prometheus]

I play only on playstations but PBZ can benefit from 120fps. It's very good at 60fps but the game is so rapid that sometimes even 60fps for a 3rd person view with no motion blur feels a tiny bit slow.

My camera has a digital viewfinder at 240Hz and switching back to 120Hz can feel like a very noticeable downgrade for sports and wildlife.

GTA games are sluggish so 30fps won't be too bad but 60fps is 100% doable even on base PS5. Fuck Rockstar lazy devs.

Honestly even 60FPS has a ton of blur my 165Hz display.

60FPS does look better on a 60Hz display however (my laptop)

But nevermind framerates - I just hope the core gameplay and mechanics of GTA6 are better. The previous GTA games have genuinely terrible gameplay with tank controls. You want good gameplay? Go play Sleeping Dogs or Watch Dogs. Your character movement, aiming - all superior to anything Rockstar has released.

RDR2 also controls like garbage. Sure, they have created a 'wonderful and engrossing world' - but if the game plays like shit, why does that matter?

The only mechanically good game I've played from Rockstar is Max Payne 3.

 

[Bo_Hazem]

Honestly even 60FPS has a ton of blur my 165Hz display.

60FPS does look better on a 60Hz display however (my laptop)

But nevermind framerates - I just hope the core gameplay and mechanics of GTA6 are better. The previous GTA games have genuinely terrible gameplay with tank controls. You want good gameplay? Go play Sleeping Dogs or Watch Dogs. Your character movement, aiming - all superior to anything Rockstar has released.

RDR2 also controls like garbage. Sure, they have created a 'wonderful and engrossing world' - but if the game plays like shit, why does that matter?

The only mechanically good game I've played from Rockstar is Max Payne 3.