The idea of a console makers entire strategy being subscription based is not a future we want.It was always funny to see the "blue rats" doing mental gymnastic to discredit Game Pass.
The reality was....They were just jelly.
The idea of a console makers entire strategy being subscription based is not a future we want.It was always funny to see the "blue rats" doing mental gymnastic to discredit Game Pass.
The reality was....They were just jelly.
The idea of a console makers entire strategy being subscription based is not a future we want.
He also says there will be games and I'm still looking for those.
He also says there will be games and I'm still looking for those.
He also says there will be games and I'm still looking for those.
Is not the future we want, but is the future we will get.The idea of a console makers entire strategy being subscription based is not a future we want.
What big games are you playing that makes it the best deal compared to PS+? Keep in mind that PS+ has many games from Bethesda and Activision too.Everyone knows it's the best deal in gaming, so there's not much to talk about.
I like a lot of different games, not just the "muh production values" ones (which more often than not bore me to death, sadly), so I always have way more to play than I have time on my hands.What big games are you playing that makes it the best deal compared to PS+? Keep in mind that PS+ has many games from Bethesda and Activision too.
The Yakuza games are dirt cheap on PS (like $3) so it can't be that too.
Those small indie games are already cheap to begin with so getting them on a sub is not a good deal. The hype on GP was all about the Day 1 AAA.I like a lot of different games, not just the "muh production values" ones (which more often than not bore me to death, sadly), so I always have way more to play than I have time on my hands.
In droughts like these, when there are no first-party AAA games releasing, they had to get 3P AAA games which they couldn't.It would be stupid from Microsoft to spend potentially hundreds of millions of dollars on 3rd party games like that. That's why they've been buying the biggest publishers in the industry. The plan is to have the big AAA games all come from 1st party, and then to add some smaller day one 3rd party games like they've been doing for the past two or so years.
The problem is no one wants to play those games.It would be stupid from Microsoft to spend potentially hundreds of millions of dollars on 3rd party games like that. That's why they've been buying the biggest publishers in the industry. The plan is to have the big AAA games all come from 1st party, and then to add some smaller day one 3rd party games like they've been doing for the past two or so years.
So like ps+.I like a lot of different games, not just the "muh production values" ones (which more often than not bore me to death, sadly), so I always have way more to play than I have time on my hands.
They're not cheap, especially the day one games. They usually cost more than a month of GPU, which makes GPU a great deal.Those small indie games are already cheap to begin with so getting them on a sub is not a good deal. The hype on GP was all about the Day 1 AAA.
If you want no-name indies and simulators you can get better ones on a random charity bundle or on Fanatical.
AAA publishers abandonned GP after Square screwed up with Outriders. Activision also never supported it.
MS always has a plan, then time passes and they need to come up with another plan.It would be stupid from Microsoft to spend potentially hundreds of millions of dollars on 3rd party games like that. That's why they've been buying the biggest publishers in the industry. The plan is to have the big AAA games all come from 1st party, and then to add some smaller day one 3rd party games like they've been doing for the past two or so years.
Be honest, you would never buy or play any of them besides the bigger ones like TMNT or Tunic. Majority of subscribers don't even click on them to try. A bunch of fodder, epic store giveaway rejects.They're not cheap, especially the day one games. They usually cost more than a month of GPU, which makes GPU a great deal.
Strong 2021 on PC maybe but not on console. The usual Halo/Forza and a kickstarter game.What are all of these AAA 3P games MS was supposed to get for 2022? Elden Ring? It’s nice that Sony has a strong 2022, after a weak 2021. MS has a weak 2022, after a strong 2021. It’s almost like all of this is a balance and games take years to make. And did someone just say FOUR AAA games a month from MS wouldn’t be enough
Be honest, you would never buy or play any of them besides the bigger ones like TMNT or Tunic. Majority of subscribers don't even click on them to try. A bunch of fodder, epic store giveaway rejects.
Strong 2021 on PC maybe but not on console. The usual Halo/Forza and a kickstarter game.
I wouldn't call Returnal and Ratchet a weak 2021 for Sony. Returnal won all the major awards.