The AC games don't deserve the discussion they are getting, they are the diabetes of the gaming world
What I said has absolutely nothing to do with being "woke", where did you get that from?The point is there isn't anything woke about making out the templars to be baddies lol, they've been made out to be baddies for centuries
don't forget Aliens. AC at it's core is a game about aliens.It is not like you are doing a documentary.
It is a fictional game that involve even time travel after all… the guy could have lasers as weapon that it should be fine.
Go up a few posts to where this sidetrack started lolWhat I said has absolutely nothing to do with being "woke", where did you get that from?
My actual point that I would like to not get misrepresented is that AC games never were historically accurate to begin with. Also, that has nothing to do with "woke", of course.
It is the 1st time. The entire gimmick of the story is the assassins are in the shadows of history. Now they are a main character of it. Why didn't we play as Jefferson in AC3? Or Blackbeard in Black Flag?
I didnt play the game but wasnt it set in 50BC?
While I agree Egyptian history is not correct the way it is presented to the world (shoutout to John Anthony West’s magical Egypt lol) by 50bc and onwards Egypt was so mixed its not too far fetched having the last Medjay as a berber type mixing with other africans and everyone from that region. Im sure they were mixing it up around that time.
The series is based off Hasan Sabbah, but the game still hasnt had a setting or character in based off iran. But you dont hear me complain about it lol
What university is claiming he was not a samurai? Their opinion doesn't count if it wasn't a Japanese university that made that claim.And there's an entire University claiming he's not. They even fired the one guy that was making Wiki changes.They even have polititians involved. It's fun to watch, if nothing else.
If tgis turns out to be a good game, this all goes away. But man, I've never seen a game get this much crap for this.
What university is claiming he was not a samurai? Their opinion doesn't count if it wasn't a Japanese university that made that claim.
So now the issue is the game itself has changed or that historical characters are used incorrectly? I mean it’s a game. It doesn’t have to follow every rule 100%.
I don’t obsess too much over how Assassins Creed has changed gameplay wise. The recent games are enjoyable to me. The main point is i really don’t see a major problem with a real person that was a Samurai being a playable character.
Arguments whether he was or not act like there’s absolutely zero history and text that mentions him as so. It’s not something that’s completely made up.
Very true, yes. 50 BCE is when the Greeks and Romans were there and before them there were already wave after wave of invasions that cause mixing of the population.
It’s still funny a known ethnic group from Nubia is still not depicted, or even seen as on some occasions, as a Upper Nile Nilotic people.
At least Bayek’s voice actor is black. So there’s that I guess.
It seems to be about the level of an upper rank large public college in America, but not elite tier. Maybe something like a Purdue
No idea how good it is.