Source
I kind of agree with this. Microsoft makes better hardware (Xbox Series X for example), has the better services (Game Pass), way more 1st party publishers (+ 2 publishers) and A LOT more money. Microsoft will buy more 1st party studios and maybe even a third publisher.
But I would rather see Sony go 3rd party. Stop making consoles and just make games for all platforms (PC, Xbox, Switch).
I already discussed this here.
I think when Sony's upcoming 10 GaaS games all flopped they will realize it's time to move on and become a 3rd party publisher.
Xbox does not make better hardware.
OG XBOX: 1 year and a half after PS2, literally a mobile PC with Windows CE. Less hardware features over PS2, less complexity in design.
XBOX 360: Red Ring of Death, 54% defect ratio, need I say more? The consoles with the most revisions and iterations. No internal BD drive, no internal wifi, expensive propietary peripheals especially the HDD. Then you needed a battery shed for their controllers, weak dpad.
XBOX ONE: Weak console, which also saw so many OS/Memory allocation changes to improve performance. Dropped features to give a little more memory/cpu cycles to the devs, pretty much a 900p machine with reduced features and worse framerate.
As for the argument of MS buying Sony. It makes no logical sense why this needs to happen or will ever happen. MS has not made a hit internally since inception, everything they have had has been bought. Gears, bought from Epic, Halo bought from Bungie, (the team which did ONI), MS bought Turn 10. Then if we move down the timeline. RARE and all it's games, RARE only made sense on Nintendo, since MS's acquisition, no one ever talks about RARE with any acclaim, they have taken a terrible jolt relative to quality.
MS bought several studios since 2018, nothing to show yet, they've bought Bethesda, nothing to show yet, they've developed the world's first AAAA studio since millennia, nothing to show yet, last I heard, they were working on a remake of a failed sequel under MS's hand and direction (Perfect Dark), and even that is proving too much for them to get up and running, so much for AAAA, so much for new IP's or exciting IP's.
So if MS buys the whole industry you think the industry will be healthy. Look at how MS is managing and destroying studios which were decent before, these studios are just stuck in a rut. Yet anything to stop the console wars right? A few people calling MS out for not doing anything special with games, calling out bad and biased journalism is the problem right? because that is all I'm seeing. Further to that, the console war is necessary for this industry, it's what gives the industry the edge in pushing the envelope? This "ending the console war" schtick sounds more or less like a pinky and the brain endeavor with Pinocchio as the third wheel. All I see from the "lets end the console war crowd" are persons who want to intentionally occlude criticism and free speech because their favorite company MS is just not providing quality games that are pushing this industry.
MS minion sites like GAF and DF seems to have been given some sort of ambassadorship to quell the console wars against MS, to them I say good luck in changing the industry or getting MS at the helm of gaming. Perhaps some criticism would put them in a better direction than grand-phil-fellation. The truth is, the day MS takes over this whole industry is the very day I turn my back on gaming and this is not out of hate for MS, It's only because of the precedent set by them. Trying to monopolize the industry, lowering the quality of games through their gamepass initiative, having no AAA GOTY level games for years and years ongoing. It certainly won't be a prosperous outlook for the industry if they ever hold the reigns you desire.