It's a far cry from the absurdity of photoshopping it out of the top spot in sales charts, but a robust disclaimer by its very existence indicates to users that 'this topic is bad bad not good, so if you could please avoid it for the sake of polite society that would be appreciated.'Am I defending something by pointing out market realities? If anything I'm in here defending myself since there was a thread made for one of my tweets (which was correct) and I got mentioned in this thread for a tweet that was also 100% correct but some people don't like that I'm bringing attention to something they'd rather ignore or spin.
I could ignore it but I'd rather not allow people to just dismiss information that is backed up by professional analysis.
If talk about Install Base is off topic this can be removed but for one, there is no "marginalisation" of Hogwart's Legacy. We don't ban discussion and anyone is free to talk about it or any controversial game as long as it's in respect to affected communities.
You'd have to share what you mean by downplaying PlayStation. Everyone was talking up PS5 selling more than peak PS2.
Most people are in support of the Activision deal and it just isn't anticompetitive by an metric.
On Starfield, I just don't see why it's initial success is being questioned. The launch metrics will be insane and at the worst if it's a genuinely bad product, legs will be disastrous. Starfield will be marketed as the next Skyrim but in space and everyone knows about Skyrim. Current gen has only sold +50M combined so far, while 8th gen sold +170M. There's still plenty of potential Bethesda casuals that can pick up an Xbox purely for that exact experience, which is the whole point of making Starfield exclusive. The idea that Bethesda RPG's are strong enough to get people to buy a console.
If you want to talk about pure sales, sure, I won't say Starfield ships +10M at launch. What it will most likely do is +20M players in Month 1, faster than Halo Infinite and Forza Horizon 5.
I can screenshot posts but I'd rather not clog up the forum and given that you're staff there, it's unlikely to sway you.
The deal is hugely anticompetitive, as evidenced by 3 key market competition regulators raising concerns about a lessening of competition or outright rejecting the deal (FTC).
Define the launch metrics and define insanity and we can continue the discussion about Starfield's predicted success.