Sony's future and possible studio/publisher acquisitions

OP
OP
Eternal_Wings

Eternal_Wings

Dein Nomos
24 Jun 2022
3,013
3,988
I feel like theyve been saying this for almost 2 years now and have almost nothing to show for it.
True but this time I feel they made (finally) a resolve. They probably have given up on Activision Blizzard. It’s time to fight back for Sony and stop their whining about lost things.
 

Dabaus

Veteran
28 Jun 2022
3,071
4,695
Sometimes zubytech tweets something that can be months old as like a reminder. Did sony have a meeting or something today?
 
  • thinking_hard
Reactions: Bryank75

Zzero

Major Tom
9 Jan 2023
4,005
2,333
Also, MiHoyo has a global publishing company in Singapore (Cognosphere) who basically handles all their operations outside China. So they could keep MiHoyo inside China as a Chinese company while selling -all, or half- of Cognosphere to Sony.
Lol, I was the one who showed you that two or three weeks ago. But yes, Sony could buy the global publishing arm, if they were willing to sell and Sony had the money to buy. Of course, and this is just guessing, but Mihoyo would still own the rights and could send them elsewhere if they so chose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bryank75

Yurinka

Veteran
VIP
21 Jun 2022
7,778
6,665
Lol, I was the one who showed you that two or three weeks ago. But yes, Sony could buy the global publishing arm, if they were willing to sell and Sony had the money to buy. Of course, and this is just guessing, but Mihoyo would still own the rights and could send them elsewhere if they so chose.
I think Sony would be to buy full console exclusivity for their IPs, marketing and publishing rights in all platforms outside China to make sure MiHoyo don't sell them, even if the MiHoyo company continues being independent, Chinese and they handle their Chinese market and support Sony there.

But in any case, Genshin Impact is making a shit ton of money and have a huge growth. Meaning that their value must be too, too high and at the same time in a few years will be way higher. So stakeholders wouldn't want to sell now because their stocks will be way more valuable in a few years.

So I think it's pretty unlikely to see Sony buying MiHoyo or Cognosphere, or even getting a large minority share of stocks just for a few IPs. I think Sony will continue signing for 3rd party console exclusivity for the few games they think are worth it. Way more affordable for Sony, for a realistic pricing and still would be very profitable for them.
 

ksdixon

Dixon Cider Ltd.
22 Jun 2022
1,887
1,211
Fate/Grand Order, developed by Sony's Lasengle (formerly Delightworks' gaming division) and published by Sony's Aniplex generated to Sony:
  • $646 million (2015/2016)
  • $982 million (2017)
  • >$1,228 million (2018)
  • 1.2 billion (2019)
  • As of July 2021, the game grossed $5.4 billion worldwide (7th top grossing mobile game ever in gaming history)
  • I don't know its current revenue, but in the last 2 years must have made more money
"PS Mobiles" doesn't exist. But if you mean the SIE/PS Studios mobile gaming team yes, at least as of now it's a different team from Aniplex, Crunchyroll Games, ForwardWorks or other mobile gaming Sony teams.

I understand their divisions and subsidiaries are different companies with different interests, but if I was Sony I'd move all their gaming publishers and developers to their main gaming division/company (SIE) and merge their mobile gaming publishers under a single publishing brand (PlayStation Mobile maybe?) that should be under SIE and put under it all their dev teams and mobile games, localizing and releasing globally those titles who were Japan/Asia only until now.
The fuck? Tie all those up in a "PSX" team for entertainment hardware like phones / and their support. PS/Xperia.

That's an accounting trick to grift profits from games, and recoup elsewhere. So much for that "One Sony" ethos a while back.
 

Nhomnhom

Banned
25 Mar 2023
8,414
11,560
I was formatting this table to use in a future thread and I felt it would make sense to post here. This are the actual studios (meaning not port house, mobile or support) Sony will have to compete against Xbox Game Studios, Bethesda, Blizzard and Activision.

NameLocation/sAcquiredLast GameNext Game
Bend StudioBend, Oregon2000Days Gone (2018 - 71) ported to PC?
Bluepoint GamesAustin, Texas2021Demon's Souls (2020 - 92)?
FirespriteLiverpool2021Horizon Call of the Mountain (2023 - 79)?
Firewalk StudiosBellevue, Washington2023-Concord
Guerrilla GamesAmsterdam2005Horizon Forbidden West (2022 - 88)?
Haven StudiosMontreal, Quebec2022-Fairgame$
HousemarqueHelsinki2021Returnal (2021 - 86) ported to PC?
Insomniac GamesBurbank, California & Durham, North Carolina2019Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart (2021 - 88) ported to PCMarvel's Spider-Man 2
London StudioLondonBlood & Truth (VR - 2019 - 80)?
Media MoleculeGuildford2010Dreams (2020 - 89)?
Naughty DogSanta Monica, California2001The Last of Us Part I (2022 - 88) ported to PCThe Last of Us "Factions"
Polyphony DigitalTokyoGran Turismo 7 (2022 - 87)?
Santa Monica StudioLos Angeles, CaliforniaGod of War Ragnarok (2022 - 94)?
Sucker Punch ProductionsBellevue, Washington2011Ghost of Tsushima (2020 - 83)?
Team AsobiTokyoAstro's Playroom (2020 - 83)?
San Diego StudioSan Diego, CaliforniaMLB: The Show (anual multiple platform releases)-
BungieBellevue, Washington2022Destiny 2 (2017 - multiplataform)Marathon

10/17 are in the US/NA.
2/17 are in Japan.
5/17 are in Europe.
6/17 acquired from 2020 onwards.
 
Last edited:

Bryank75

I don't get ulcers, I give 'em!
Founder
18 Jun 2022
9,444
16,572
icon-era.com
If we assume that TakeTwo would be denied for Microsoft...

Then Sony should go for Ubisoft, Capcom, IOI and Arc System Works IMO
 
OP
OP
Eternal_Wings

Eternal_Wings

Dein Nomos
24 Jun 2022
3,013
3,988
If we assume that TakeTwo would be denied for Microsoft...

Then Sony should go for Ubisoft, Capcom, IOI and Arc System Works IMO
Square Enix is right now more important. They also have currently a low market cap. They will buy them before they reach similar to Capcom market cap. Capcom is not running away, they can wait. But Square Enix definitely not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arminius

Puff

Veteran
10 Jan 2023
1,503
3,669
If we assume that TakeTwo would be denied for Microsoft...

Then Sony should go for Ubisoft, Capcom, IOI and Arc System Works IMO

8nndggi0gdg81.jpg


Ubisoft:

XDefiant
Rayman
Test Drive Unlimited: Solar Crown
Just Dance
The Division
FarCry
Rainbow6
Immortals Fenyx Rising
Assassin’s Creed
Ghost Recon
Watch Dogs
Splinter Cell


No need to buy SquareEnix. Sony should be going for Ubisoft
 
Last edited:

Nhomnhom

Banned
25 Mar 2023
8,414
11,560
If we assume that TakeTwo would be denied for Microsoft...

Then Sony should go for Ubisoft, Capcom, IOI and Arc System Works IMO
If they buy Ubisoft I'm out, no more PlayStation for me, ever. I find it bad enough that some of their games already take too much inspiration from the awful Ubisoft gamedesign.

8nndggi0gdg81.jpg


Ubisoft:

XDefiant
Rayman
Test Drive Unlimited: Solar Crown
Just Dance
The Division
FarCry
Rainbow6
Immortals Fenyx Rising
Assassin’s Creed
Ghost Recon
Watch Dogs
Splinter Cell


No need to buy SquareEnix. Sony should be going for Ubisoft
Pure trash. Depressing to even think half of Sony studios would be this bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eternal_Wings
OP
OP
Eternal_Wings

Eternal_Wings

Dein Nomos
24 Jun 2022
3,013
3,988
If they buy Ubisoft I'm out, no more PlayStation for me, ever. I find it bad enough that some of their games already take too much inspiration from the awful Ubisoft gamedesign.


Pure trash. Depressing to even think half of Sony studios would be this bad.
I doubt that Sony would be interested in a bloated mess like Ubisoft. Sony has already similar studios who are living the Ubisoft formula but in better quality. Let’s hypothetically Sony is interested in Ubi, I think the French would rather be bought by Microsoft. If I am not mistaken, Ubisoft and Microsoft have a close relationship. Nah Sony will not buy something like Ubisoft. Honestly Sega would be much more realistic than Ubisoft.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nhomnhom

Nhomnhom

Banned
25 Mar 2023
8,414
11,560
I doubt that Sony would be interested in a bloated mess like Ubisoft. Sony has already similar studios who are living the Ubisoft formula but in better quality. Let’s hypothetically Sony is interested in Ubi, I think the French would rather be bought by Microsoft. If I am not mistaken, Ubisoft and Microsoft have a close relationship. Nah Sony will not buy something like Ubisoft. Honestly Sega would be much more realistic than Ubisoft.
Capcom, CDPR, SE, Take Two are all much better fits.

Ubisoft is the definition of mediocrity and uninspired design. The aspects on recent Sony game that resemble Ubisoft games are the worst things going on in those games.
 
  • they're_right_you_know
Reactions: Eternal_Wings

Zzero

Major Tom
9 Jan 2023
4,005
2,333
8nndggi0gdg81.jpg


Ubisoft:

XDefiant
Rayman
Test Drive Unlimited: Solar Crown
Just Dance
The Division
FarCry
Rainbow6
Immortals Fenyx Rising
Assassin’s Creed
Ghost Recon
Watch Dogs
Splinter Cell


No need to buy SquareEnix. Sony should be going for Ubisoft
Studios are way more important than IP and Ubisoft has tons of bloat (not to mention their leadership is openly hostile to being brought out.) Just not a good buy unless you intend to cut a lot. Would be better to just buy one or two specific teams that you want.
 

Gediminas

Boy...
Founder
21 Jun 2022
7,577
9,288
Studios are way more important than IP and Ubisoft has tons of bloat (not to mention their leadership is openly hostile to being brought out.) Just not a good buy unless you intend to cut a lot. Would be better to just buy one or two specific teams that you want.
of course Sony or some other company would clean them a bit.
i think, actually they are very good buy, totally, even if you buy them for 5B and put extra 2B or more. it is worth. the legacy IPs, current IPs is way more valuable than Zenimax ever been, and that one costed 8,3B+ some billions for retention packages(unless they skipped it).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Puff

Zzero

Major Tom
9 Jan 2023
4,005
2,333
of course Sony or some other company would clean them a bit.
i think, actually they are very good buy, totally, even if you buy them for 5B and put extra 2B or more. it is worth. the legacy IPs, current IPs is way more valuable than Zenimax ever been, and that one costed 8,3B+ some billions for retention packages(unless they skipped it).
Its a much bigger company than Bethesda was, too, but the difference was Bethesda was almost all meat and very little fat (sorry Arkane and Machine Games, which aren't even bad studios,) with Ubisoft you would have to purchase a lot of things that you then don't have immediate use for. Would be better to just purchase a few studios and their IP, like Trackmania, Red Storm, Milan, Montpellier, Annency, that type of group.
 

Zeno

Member
28 Jun 2023
71
117
There is nothing stopping anyone from acquiring a subsidiary owned by someone else. Lol.

Firewalk Studios was a subsidiary of ProbablyMonsters for example, just as FromSoftware is a subsidiary of Kadokawa. LMAO


If ABK is approved somehow: CDPR, Capcom, Square Enix, From Software.

If ABK is stopped but MSFT intend to go after more: Capcom, Square Enix, From Software.

If ABK is stopped and MSFT pull out of console hardware: Square Enix, From Software.

CDPR is the direct answer to Bethesda.

Capcom is what would ensure Sony would become everlasting like Nintendo.

Square Enix and From Software would be mostly defensive moves.
I agree with the "If ABK is approved" part.

CDPR would be really important to have. With the guidance of Sony and incorporating them to the exchange between the Playstation Studios could also have a really positive influence on them.

With Capcom, Sony would also secure some really beloved IPs and franchises. Street Fighter, Resident Evil, Mega Man

Square Enix I would say could go either way. The relationship is already pretty good so deepening it could also be something to explore, besides a whole acquisition.

Securing these 3 should be possible in terms of financeability and also should have no regulatory troubles.

Again, I can only see this "if" the ABK acquisition goes through.
Should no ABK acquisition take place I also can see Sony just deepening the relationship to Square Enix.
 

Nhomnhom

Banned
25 Mar 2023
8,414
11,560
I agree with the "If ABK is approved" part.

CDPR would be really important to have. With the guidance of Sony and incorporating them to the exchange between the Playstation Studios could also have a really positive influence on them.

With Capcom, Sony would also secure some really beloved IPs and franchises. Street Fighter, Resident Evil, Mega Man

Square Enix I would say could go either way. The relationship is already pretty good so deepening it could also be something to explore, besides a whole acquisition.

Securing these 3 should be possible in terms of financeability and also should have no regulatory troubles.

Again, I can only see this "if" the ABK acquisition goes through.
Should no ABK acquisition take place I also can see Sony just deepening the relationship to Square Enix.
A publisher like CDPR would be an answer to Bethesda no ABK.

If you look at the list I posted about studio you will see that close to 60% of Sony studios are in NA. To me that alone would justify expanding their development studios in Europe and Asia since PlayStation has global appeal.

Xbox is not nearly as popular as PlayStation but no even without ABK is probably already has more studios and possibility more employees as well. Why would Sony accept to be in such a vulnerable position and not leverage their massive market share advantage to fight MS now instead of 5 years from now?
 
OP
OP
Eternal_Wings

Eternal_Wings

Dein Nomos
24 Jun 2022
3,013
3,988
I agree with the "If ABK is approved" part.

CDPR would be really important to have. With the guidance of Sony and incorporating them to the exchange between the Playstation Studios could also have a really positive influence on them.

With Capcom, Sony would also secure some really beloved IPs and franchises. Street Fighter, Resident Evil, Mega Man

Square Enix I would say could go either way. The relationship is already pretty good so deepening it could also be something to explore, besides a whole acquisition.

Securing these 3 should be possible in terms of financeability and also should have no regulatory troubles.

Again, I can only see this "if" the ABK acquisition goes through.
Should no ABK acquisition take place I also can see Sony just deepening the relationship to Square Enix.
You forgot Zenimax. They are much bigger than Square Enix. TES, Wolfenstein, Fallout are massive Franchises. Sony will buy Square Enix to counter Bethesda not Activision Blizzard. Sony has a huge gap for RPGs now that Microsoft gobbled all competent RPG devs up.

Sony made their resolve independently of the ABK outcome. This was a day after the PI was denied and Microsoft’s celebrating PR:

“We will continue to make strategic investments going forward, prioritizing intellectual property,” Totoki was quoted as saying.

Sony CFO - Hiroki Totoki