Spare me of that Marxist nonsenseAgain, how do bribery allegations against Microsoft in developing countries have ANYTHING to do with game reviews in the US and Europe? Note the countries where they were able to do this: Hungary, South Africa, the "Middle East", these are countries already rife with corruption (not that western Europe or US is free of it, but you're generally more likely to get caught and punished for it). You somehow think that because they were able to do shady deals in these countries - it somehow proves they are bribing journalists in the west to smear and praise video games at their behest.
Never once did I say Microsoft are angels that have never done shady shit, and bribery is one of their lesser offenses in my book. But again, Nintendo and Sony have been sued for price fixing. Nintendo has had ties with organized crime in Japan. Sony specifically has been caught creating fake reviews for their movies. If a company having done shady shit in the past is enough of a reason for you to conclude they are definitely messing with video game reviews, then all three of them will be guilty of it which mean it doesn't matter because they'll cancel each other out.
This is not about me believing everything at face value - it's me not believing every bit of random bullshit accusation that gets tossed around, even against a company that I hate like Microsoft, with zero evidence. You're doing the opposite. You hate Microsoft and have already convinced yourself that they must be messing with reviews and media coverage because you're looking for a reason why a Sony game might get a low score or an Xbox game a high one (and ignore all the cases where the Sony games get the high scores and the Xbox game gets dunked on), so you start grasping at straws looking for totally unrelated accusations against them because you cannot actually find any evidence for the main accusation you are making against them. Yet for Sony and Nintendo you'll ignore their controversies, even though out of these three companies Sony has come the closest to messing around with reviews.
But that's not the argument/accusation. I'm not arguing here that Microsoft is an innocent company. I'm saying that if the accusation is that they're bribing games journalists in reputable outlets like IGN, Eurogamer, GameSpot etc. to game review scores in their favor or in the disfavor of their "rivals" - I'm gonna need some more evidence than "Microsoft has done briberies for business deals in developing nations in the past". Because every company has done shady shit, and like I said above, Sony is the only one who has actually gotten caught trying to game reviews. I don't believe any of these companies is trying to influence video game reviews. There are far too many outlets to cover and the risk for both parties is far too high. The most you can accuse Microsoft of is giving codes and preview invites to Xbox fanboy sites, but again, Metacritic/Opencritic are the ones who allow these sites to affect the aggregate. And Nintendo does the same.
I'm far more critical of the west than most people on this place but the west being more tolerant of minorities is definitely one of the areas where the west is better than China. I'm sorry but a Chinese writer mocking political correctness at western game studios when their own games get censored all the time over political outrage is peak irony. The Chinese are much bigger snowflakes than the minorities western studios are supposedly scared of offending.
Minorities lmao
If we live in a globalised world as we do, then white people are minority. Not even 7% of global population.
I don't want to listen about Marxist propaganda nonsense
Its not the duty of Chinese to take care of "minorities". They have their own people. So called minorities can fix their own nations.
What a weird point you tried to make