What the hell are you talking about? These remasters would actually make sense. Next year is the 20th anniversary of GOW, and these are not games from 5 years ago. If they can make these games look great, people won’t mind this. People won’t mind PS2/PS3 remasters.
They’re bitter because this generation they lost the fps argument. Most games this Gen, at least on PS have a 60fps mode. Now they’re losing AI upscaling as an exclusive feature.
What are you talking about? If 1st party studios are working on PC ports, it’s very small teams inside the studios. So it’s not really affecting development of their bigger projects.
The great thing about putting a game on a subscription service is that it gives the game a chance to be played by more people. People that probably would never have bought the game. But the bad thing about subscription services, is that you don’t make money on the game you put there, in fact you...
It would have got a 95, if IGN would have given it a 10. Nothing wrong with a 9. But the reasons that reviewer game for not giving it a 10, “It’s not as good as the Mario Galaxy games and Odyssey” was stupid.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.