Here's the thing, though:
1 - If he was DM'ing a minor through Twitch for sexual encounters
with him knowing about the person's age, then it would be a crime and Twitch would have been legally obligated to report it to the police. If this was swept under the rug then
he needs to get arrested and arrests need to be made at Twitch.
2 - If he was DM'ing a minor through Twitch for sexual encounters
with him assuming the other person was 18+ (because Twitch's TOS apparently only allow for adults to use the DMs), then Twitch is on a much bigger problem than he his.
3 - If 2) is true and he did in fact do nothing wrong, then a massive defamation lawsuit is coming up that other guy's ass.
We assumed his innocence so we fired his arse.
That tweet makes no sense... Did they assume his innocence but then... didn't? Or did they say they started by assuming his innocence but after gathering information they concluded he was guilty?
It also looks like they killed their own F2P game overnight with that tweet.