Controversy Surrounds Missing IGN Review in Metacritic's Starfield Aggregates
———————-
Edit : Update, 5th Sep 2023 - over a week later, the IGN review has finally been added to the Xbox Metacritic score, dropping the overall aggregate.
———————-
In the gaming community's anticipation of Bethesda's much-anticipated release, "Starfield," players and enthusiasts turned to Metacritic to gauge the initial reception of the game. Metacritic, a widely respected platform for aggregating reviews and assigning Metascores, carries substantial weight in influencing consumer decisions and industry-related matters. However, a surprising revelation left gamers questioning the integrity of this influential platform.
As the game reached a wide release, many eager fans flocked to Metacritic, hoping to get a sense of how "Starfield" was faring critically. One of the first stops for enthusiasts was the Xbox reviews section on metacritic.com, a critical hub for console gamers.
To their astonishment, a particular review was conspicuously absent from the list: the controversial IGN 7/10 review. IGN, a prominent and industry-leading review site, carries significant influence in the gaming sphere. Their reviews often hold considerable weight in shaping a game's final Metascore, which can ultimately impact consumer choices and industry-related incentives.
At first glance, it was natural to assume that the missing review was exclusively focused on the PC version of "Starfield." However, a closer examination of the IGN review by Dan Stapleton revealed that it covered both the PC and Xbox versions of the game. The review explicitly stated, "Reviewed on PC and Xbox Series X," leaving no room for ambiguity regarding the platforms it evaluated.
This startling omission raised questions about the transparency and impartiality of Metacritic's review aggregation process. Many began to question whether the platform was selectively curating reviews to favor certain narratives or outcomes. The concern wasn't merely about an individual game; it extended to the broader implications of Metacritic's practices.
Metacritic, as a platform wielding tremendous influence, not only informs consumer purchase decisions but also plays a pivotal role in determining industry bonuses and influencing the direction of future game projects. The apparent exclusion of the IGN review, which had reviewed both PC and Xbox versions, stirred suspicions of corruption within the platform.
Gamers and industry professionals alike now await an explanation from Metacritic regarding the missing review. The incident serves as a stark reminder of the power that review aggregation platforms hold in shaping the gaming landscape and highlights the need for transparency and accountability in their operations. The controversy surrounding "Starfield" is not just about one game but reflects a broader concern about the integrity of the gaming industry's evaluation processes.
IconERA original Article.
———————-
Edit : Update, 5th Sep 2023 - over a week later, the IGN review has finally been added to the Xbox Metacritic score, dropping the overall aggregate.
———————-
In the gaming community's anticipation of Bethesda's much-anticipated release, "Starfield," players and enthusiasts turned to Metacritic to gauge the initial reception of the game. Metacritic, a widely respected platform for aggregating reviews and assigning Metascores, carries substantial weight in influencing consumer decisions and industry-related matters. However, a surprising revelation left gamers questioning the integrity of this influential platform.
As the game reached a wide release, many eager fans flocked to Metacritic, hoping to get a sense of how "Starfield" was faring critically. One of the first stops for enthusiasts was the Xbox reviews section on metacritic.com, a critical hub for console gamers.
To their astonishment, a particular review was conspicuously absent from the list: the controversial IGN 7/10 review. IGN, a prominent and industry-leading review site, carries significant influence in the gaming sphere. Their reviews often hold considerable weight in shaping a game's final Metascore, which can ultimately impact consumer choices and industry-related incentives.
At first glance, it was natural to assume that the missing review was exclusively focused on the PC version of "Starfield." However, a closer examination of the IGN review by Dan Stapleton revealed that it covered both the PC and Xbox versions of the game. The review explicitly stated, "Reviewed on PC and Xbox Series X," leaving no room for ambiguity regarding the platforms it evaluated.
This startling omission raised questions about the transparency and impartiality of Metacritic's review aggregation process. Many began to question whether the platform was selectively curating reviews to favor certain narratives or outcomes. The concern wasn't merely about an individual game; it extended to the broader implications of Metacritic's practices.
Metacritic, as a platform wielding tremendous influence, not only informs consumer purchase decisions but also plays a pivotal role in determining industry bonuses and influencing the direction of future game projects. The apparent exclusion of the IGN review, which had reviewed both PC and Xbox versions, stirred suspicions of corruption within the platform.
Gamers and industry professionals alike now await an explanation from Metacritic regarding the missing review. The incident serves as a stark reminder of the power that review aggregation platforms hold in shaping the gaming landscape and highlights the need for transparency and accountability in their operations. The controversy surrounding "Starfield" is not just about one game but reflects a broader concern about the integrity of the gaming industry's evaluation processes.
IconERA original Article.
Last edited:
