I think this comparison lacks alot. No 120fps framerate testing, the resolution testing was what Epic told them was an average ballpark for the different versions, not their own testing. Even their 60fps testing was ho-hum. When John said it's a locked 60, but "I have a feeling the framerate may fall lower" we pushed this game but could not break it, as soon as he said it, the framerate fell to 59 fps on the Series X, but he says nothing about that. Granted there are these 1 off framerate dips on PS5 too, but this is what I've found a bit dishonest with DF over the years, they tend to say things which are not typical of what they show in their videos.
I think we need a better tech test on this game tbh, even the spectating method they use does not seem to stretch the engine in any way and may not even be as accurate as you think. Tbf, I don't think Epic is lying on resolution, but the entire purpose of doing your own testing is to find out the real deal outside of Epic and present a factual and unbiased assessment based on that.
Also, John saying "Series S is impressive" is so strange to me, it has no next gen reflections, the graphics are dialed back even then, it's averaging around 720p, perhaps even less because DF likes to sugarcoat things for Series S, X and the Switch....An example, If PS dipped when John was talking about framerate, he would have talked about it. Yet in typical form, he made sure to make the "power divide joke on the rez differences"
, but wanted to shit the bed when Callisto dropped........I just find for a 30+ minute video, too much was missing.
