Take-Two CEO says AI-created hit games are a fantasy: 'Genius is the domain of human beings and I believe will stay that way'
"Artificial intelligence is an oxymoron, as is machine learning."
www.pcgamer.com
Take-Two CEO says AI-created hit games are a fantasy: 'Genius is the domain of human beings and I believe will stay that way'
- Thread starter Gamernyc78
- Start date
www.pcgamer.com
OP
OP
I agree, AL created games would/will be shovelware/mid tier and won't reach higher levels of gaming greatness imo. However it's already having a huge impact on game advertisement and some design aspects abd some ppl are losing jobs because of it.
Last edited:
This is an interesting topic. I hope that is true but I'm not sure and is definitely too early to tell. In just under a year we have seen an amazing and terrifying evolution of ia capacities, who knows what they are going to do in 5, 10 or 15 years?
On the other hand maybe this open a new market for products and art made by humans? I know I prefer to pay for a game crafted by real designers, programmers, illustrators, musicians, etc.
On the other hand maybe this open a new market for products and art made by humans? I know I prefer to pay for a game crafted by real designers, programmers, illustrators, musicians, etc.
Meanwhile MS is all in on AI generated games. I guess when you have no success with human created games you have to go all in on AI.
I wan't my games to be 100% organic, carbon based, AI free, extra crunchy.
I wan't my games to be 100% organic, carbon based, AI free, extra crunchy.
AI will not only steal jobs, but rob humans of our creativity. I really don't want to live in a world where AI is making the music I listen to, the movies I watch, and the recipes I eat. Fuck that. AI should be used to fucking automate everything and leave humans to actually be created. Instead, it's being used as a tool for megacorps and the ultra rich to increase their profits while people struggle to make ends meet.
It's a bloody dystopia.
It's a bloody dystopia.
D
Deleted member 417
Guest
He's a liar. A human may come up with the concept, story and art for a game, the rest will be AI generated. They've done this for years until the banner of "procedurally generated levels/environments" if they can expand that to games, they will.
Churning out cookie cutter, low-level phlumpff media is all Hollywood and silicon Valley can do. Having AI do it will make zero difference to the bottom-of-the-barrell quality we get in games.
Churning out cookie cutter, low-level phlumpff media is all Hollywood and silicon Valley can do. Having AI do it will make zero difference to the bottom-of-the-barrell quality we get in games.
In terms of quality, some games already feel like they're made by AI (Ubisoft).
But the big difference is: big publishers would want to use AI in a way that'll put a ton of people out of work. It's why the writers strike is happening; Hollywood production companies would NOT guarantee not replacing them with AI. That is the epitome of corporate greed. Even in games that use things like procedural generation, it still takes humans to actually design the assets. It's just the game itself using an algorithm to decide where to place those assets on a map.
But the big difference is: big publishers would want to use AI in a way that'll put a ton of people out of work. It's why the writers strike is happening; Hollywood production companies would NOT guarantee not replacing them with AI. That is the epitome of corporate greed. Even in games that use things like procedural generation, it still takes humans to actually design the assets. It's just the game itself using an algorithm to decide where to place those assets on a map.
The latest Saints Row looks like it was puked up by a woke millennial AI, and proves that good games can’t be made by artificial intelligence if it was.