Digital Foundry Wild Hearts Tech Analysis

Unchained

Well-known member
5 Dec 2022
412
1,318
https://www.eurogamer.net/digitalfo...game-impacted-by-tech-issues-on-all-platforms


It's hard to overlook Wild Hearts' visual shortfalls, however. Firstly, texture-work doesn't hold up to scrutiny when viewed up close. Even on PS5 or Series X, asset quality for moss, wood, and brickwork use distractingly low resolution maps at times. Additionally, Xbox Series S uses even lower resolution textures than the premium consoles, producing some glaringly blurry surfaces. You may not notice in the heat of the action, but in getting from A to B there are some obvious rough spots. Likewise, the method of screen-space reflections (SSR) is of a low quality for all three machines: it's a flickering, pixellated, low resolution mirror image, with a huge gap around occluding objects. Again, Series S gets a particularly raw deal here, with an even lower accuracy setting than PS5 or Series X.

In terms of visual modes and features, we have two options on PS5 and Series X. There's a resolution mode targeting a native 4K at 30 frames per second - and this does genuinely hit a native 3840x2160 in some pixel counts. However, there also appears to be a dynamic element to this. In some cases, one or both of the axes of the 4K pixel structure halve - leading to 1920x2160 or 1920x1080 as the base image in taxing areas. It's often masked by the TAA - and honestly, the result never looks as sharp as it could.

Meanwhile, there's also a performance mode on PS5 and Series X. This is my recommendation for play, just for sheer playability - even though it comes at a cost of a native 1080p resolution. The caveat is that cutscenes still lock at 30fps in the performance mode, and they continue rendering at 1080p regardless. It's hardly the next-gen dream but for an action RPG, I'd prioritise 60fps all the way. Otherwise, settings between the modes are the same. Reflections, foliage density, shadow quality, draw distance for geometry - all stay in place between the modes. It's just resolution and frame-rate targets that change.

Comparing PS5 to Series X directly, the result is a temporally unstable image on Sony's machine in spots - in the resolution mode at least. Fortunately, the opening areas before reaching the hub don't make the pixel crawl bug evident at any point. And to be clear, there is a workaround. If we switch over to its 1080p 60fps performance mode, the issue is cleared up on PS5 - and image quality matches Series X. So, all signs point to a bug on PS5 that requires fixing.

The second issue concerns dialled back ambient occlusion on Series X. You may have spotted it in the shots above, but Series X has cutbacks in ambient shading in specific spots, stripping the scene of some much-needed depth. Be it around the opening woodland tutorial, or even the shrine interiors, shading is at times removed entirely on Series X for objects - creating a visibly lighter appearance - while for other areas it's maintained. This applies regardless of if you use the performance or resolution mode on Series X, so there are no workarounds in this case.

All of which leads us to the Series S situation. I'll be very blunt here and say that Series S is very hard to recommend right now. The visual cutbacks and lack of any mode toggle between 30fps and 60fps are hugely disappointing. You get just one way to play instead: at 30 frames per second, running at a native 1600x900 resolution. The upside is there's no flickering pixel crawl artefacting as with PS5, but that's not enough to save it. Comparing to Series X in its resolution mode, there are several key drawbacks, the first being the texture resolution. Series S uses lower resolution assets for areas of terrain, creating a blurry, soup-like result. It's barely to the standards of a last-gen Xbox One release at times.

Performance mode on Series X and PS5 is the way to go. Yes, it's a native 1080p but the upside is it's a more playable experience overall. That said, it's far from perfect. On PS5 and Series X alike, expect a bulk of open-world roaming to run at 60fps with some minor drops. The first island you're exposed to is the biggest stress test by far, however: lots of foliage, complex geometry, and huge Kemono bosses spewing effects across the scene. This shows us some bottlenecks, putting us between 40 and 60fps on PS5. Adding extra ally players into the mix gives us the lowest reading here too, in bumping up the frequency of effects on-screen. On the plus side, the Minato hub, and the second island starting at the shoreline, really don't drop to nearly the same extent. Even with its issues, for PS5 users this is a clear preference, with or without a VRR display.

The state of Series X in its own performance mode mirrors PS5 fairly closely. Again, it's mostly 60fps and again, the climax to battles on the first island tip us over to the biggest drops, down to the low 40s. It's far from ideal but in like-for-like testing - charging through the temple at pace, for example - it seems that PS5 does actually run at a higher average frame-rate overall (at least for this section) with a 10-12fps advantage at best in PS5's favour. Outside in the wilderness, there isn't such a perceptible gap in usual play. So, again for Series X, the turnout for 60fps play isn't spectacular. It still needs work, with the drops hitting hardest during action, but it's a clear upgrade over the uneven 30fps in the other mode, and with some help from VRR it's salvageable.
 

Heisenberg007

Veteran
21 Jun 2022
1,255
2,565
Ratchet And Clank Reaction GIF by PlayStation
 

Satoru

Limitless
Founder
20 Jun 2022
6,800
10,250
As more and more current gen only games release, the more the PS5 shows it's the more stable platform.

Edit - That Series S version looks like a Switch game. Damn.

Edit 2 - forgot to mention the game looks like trash regardless
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deleted member 417

ethomaz

Rebolation!
21 Jun 2022
8,522
7,232
Brasil 🇧🇷
PSN ID
ethomaz
iLikeFeet@ERA summary.

  • made on the Katana Engine
  • artistically well realized
  • texture work is low resolution at times, worse on Series S
  • SSR is low quality, again even worse on Series S
  • shadow maps and AO are missing for many objects
  • shadows pop in and out depending on camera view
  • TAA has terrible ghosting
  • motion blur is broken
  • premium systems has 2 modes
    • resolution mode
      • 1080p - 2160p / 30fps
    • performance mode
      • 1080p / 60fps
      • cutscenes are 30fps
  • PS5 has an IQ bug, has a pixel crawl flicker in resolution mode
  • Series X has dialed back ambient occlusion
  • Series S
    • 900p / 30fps
    • textures are very low resolution
    • pretty much no AO
  • PC
    • constant stutter
    • updates are coming with performance fixes and dlss/fsr
  • performance
    • ps5
      • locked 30fps in resolution mode
      • 60fps with some drops in performance mode, drops lower in the heat of battle
      • has a higher average fps in the hub
    • series x
      • resolution mode has uneven frame pacing, up to 160ms at time
      • 60fps with some drops in performance mode, drops lower in the heat of battle
    • series s
      • frame pacing issues
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sircaw

ethomaz

Rebolation!
21 Jun 2022
8,522
7,232
Brasil 🇧🇷
PSN ID
ethomaz
I wonder if Sony removed the ability to post patches at launch the games should be released in better state.

Patches killed all the polish devs had with games… they even use us as paid testers.

Allow devs only post patches 1 month after launch… why not?
 
D

Deleted member 417

Guest
So, all signs point to a bug on PS5 that requires fixing.
I'll be very blunt here and say that Series S is very hard to recommend right now.
it seems that PS5 does actually run at a higher average frame-rate overall (at least for this section) with a 10-12fps advantage at best in PS5's favour
So, again for Series X, the turnout for 60fps play isn't spectacular. It still needs work, with the drops hitting hardest during action,

PS5 version is best by far but held back by a bug
Series S is unplayable
Series X drop 10-12 fps over PS5 and isn't spectacular.

3 more TF and a larger CPU is losing out to a 'weaker' machine on paper. Something very wrong with the X. Or, in the land of the throughput, the SSD-man is King.
 
24 Jun 2022
3,314
5,743
3 in a row now for PS5 with new releases. Interesting results to say the least.

More interestingly, some of these being non cross-gen games as well. When the original argument was that as cross-gen ended, Series X would start taking the lead in multiplat performances. But we've been seeing the opposite happen in practice.

I mean just think about it; Dead Space Remake, Hogwarts Legacy (technically cross-gen but no one's really playing it on a PS4 or especially XBO, they might as well just cancel those versions or do very limited physical print runs), Monster Hunter Rise, Atomic Heart and now Wild Hearts. At this point I'm expecting similar results with RE4 Remake, heck maybe even SF6 if it has a 120 FPS mode (which it should; Samurai Showdown got one for example).

What makes it even worst is that the 1P games for Xbox which could really show off what the X can do are very few and far between, and part of the reason is going to be the Series S. IMO it's more embarrassing than what the Sega Saturn went through because at least with the Saturn they had some really good-looking 1P games that were coming out regularly (at least up to late 1997) that looked as good and in some cases (like Virtua Fighter 2) better than a lot of the better-looking PS1 games at the time of release.

They had 1P games that could (and in many cases did) do as much with the hardware as a dev could have mustered at the time. We will never see that for Series X as long as Microsoft mandates native builds for Series S.