Pros
- +Productivity performance
- +Power consumption and efficiency
- +Support for CUD, IMM memory
- +Relaxed cooling requirements
- +Higher memory OC headroom
Cons
- Pricing
Blog Reviews
Toms Hardware:
TechRadar:Intel's Core Ultra 9 285K makes strong gains in productivity workloads, but it struggles to match its prior-gen counterpart in gaming performance. That leaves AMD's competing chips as a better value for gaming, while low pricing on the previous-gen Core i9-14900K will provide competition from within Intel's own lineup.
I had high hopes for Arrow Lake, and of the two current-gen processor lines, it beats out archrival AMD's Ryzen 9000 series, which is a positive. However, the new Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and Intel Core Ultra 5 245K really aren't any better than the chips they are replacing, and their efficiency gains are too modest to justify investing in a whole new platform
Video Reviews