They're not siding with MS, they're literally getting their IPs exclusively on their cloud platform, allowing them to earn more by putting them on PS. MS got fleeced in this deal. They no longer have IPs they can hold hostage. Ubisoft now controls all releases when it comes to cloud.Why is Ubisoft getting involved and siding with Microsoft? This just confirms Ubi was their next target and that's why they accept Ubi+ on Xbox first.
NOBODY can be trusted in this industry. It's like they're all double agents for Phil.
If regulators don't allow MS to outright buy Activision and all their IPs and publishing rights, what makes you think they'll allow them to buy Ubisoft, effectively bypassing their regulations? Not to mention getting all of Ubisofts IPs in the process AND a competing cloud platform?Microsoft will very likely acquire Ubisoft in a couple of years. Would match with the relationship both have. Also French do prefer American culture. They will probably now wait until Sony reveals buying Square Enix and other studio acquisitions.
Because all western antitrust authorities are corrupted and useless.If regulators don't allow MS to outright buy Activision and all their IPs and publishing rights, what makes you think they'll allow them to buy Ubisoft, effectively bypassing their regulations? Not to mention getting all of Ubisofts IPs in the process AND a competing cloud platform?
And yet here they are, outright refusing MS' previous deals and forcing them to give up cloud publishing rights on all Activision IPs to a 3rd party, effectively making all those games multiplatform.Because all western antitrust authorities are corrupted and useless.
Yeah i can't imagine the pathetic weasels in the EU being very happy now.And yet here they are, outright refusing MS' previous deals and forcing them to give up cloud publishing rights on all Activision IPs to a 3rd party, effectively making all those games multiplatform.
Even the EU is getting pissy about it.
The EUC have to look up again the deal?Yeah i can't imagine the pathetic weasels in the EU being very happy now.
They've been forced to look at this merger again because the CMA forced microsofts hand.
They decided on the old deal. This is a brand new one so they'll have to look at it. I'm sure the decision will remain the same, though.The EUC have to look up again the deal?
I thought they already decided.
Keeps getting confusing…
Yeah somewhat, here's a comment from a mlex reportThe EUC have to look up again the deal?
I thought they already decided.
Keeps getting confusing…
- Microsoft's restructuring of its acquisition of Activision Blizzard to win UK approval will see the European Commission assess whether a fresh EU notification is necessary.
- Microsoft believes the divestment of cloud-gaming rights to Ubisoft outside of Europe will allow it to respect EU commitments adopted in May, but officials are now studying if a new review by the EU merger regulator is needed. "The commission is carefully assessing whether the developments in the UK require another notification to the commission," a spokesperson for the EU authority said."
Ubisoft will be free to do whatever they feel best with streaming rights. They'll probably have them on XGP and PSN, at least for the live service games. (which, since this is modern day AB, is all of them)So MS have passed ABK catalogue onto Ubisoft+ and won't have them on GP?
Why only 15 years? Shouldn't it be indefinite?
Also, Ubisoft is one of the companies MS was looking into. Wouldn't surprise me they buy them and default the right back to them.
And again, this is not a big deal. MS still gets the IPs, still gets to impose their rules on console games and still gets a cut from Ubisoft.
If the CMA truly wanted to do something, they;d request full divestiture of Activision/Blizzard and let MS keep their mobile games like they said they wanted. But, the CMA always had issues with cloud gaming only, so I can't really blame them from going with this.
Heh, maybe they're planning on buying Ubisoft next...
Microsoft will very likely acquire Ubisoft in a couple of years. Would match with the relationship both have. Also French do prefer American culture. They will probably now wait until Sony reveals buying Square Enix and other studio acquisitions.
The Sony 10 year deal seems to only be for Call of Duty, and any exclusives ABK games will have to be streamed on PlayStation.Sony still has a separate 10 years deal with Microsoft so I hope it guarantees native version on Playstation and not all this Ubisoft fuckery.
I know Ubi+ was announced on PS5 but I'm sure they're rethinking that now.
They will still be on GP natively, just not streamable through xcloud UNLESS Ubisoft sells Xbox a licenseSo MS have passed ABK catalogue onto Ubisoft+ and won't have them on GP?
Why is Ubisoft getting involved and siding with Microsoft? This just confirms Ubi was their next target and that's why they accept Ubi+ on Xbox first.
NOBODY can be trusted in this industry. It's like they're all double agents for Phil.
So MS have passed ABK catalogue onto Ubisoft+ and won't have them on GP?
Both Ubisoft and ABK are top 3rd party publishers for consoles. ABK not being a 3P anymore means Ubisoft climbs one position in the 'most important 3P console publishers' ranking.i dont get how that makes them direct competitors, their games are very different
The CMA considered that to keep CoD exclusive in a single cloud gaming platform could potentially hurt the potential future cloud gaming platform. So MS signed deals to put CoD (and in some years other AB games) during 10 years in multiple cloud gaming platforms. And sold the cloud gaming rights of all Activision Blizzard games published before 2039 to Ubisoft, meaning Ubisoft could license them to more cloud gaming companies as could be Sony, Nintendo, Apple, Tencent, etc.If CMA didn't allow a platform holder to hold those rights, why would it be any different for a platform holder that tries to acquire Ubisoft?