He didn't missed. Why Nintendo released more games than Sony? Guess what, their games surely don't consume such resources as Sony's games. You want more blockbuster games by Sony? Well, maybe they should switch to cute looking games.I see that people are finally starting to agree with me when it comes to Nintendo being the dominant force when in consoles and having a much better approach to selling consoles than Sony does.
Way to completely miss the point. This has nothing to do with game budget, it has to do with Nintendo betting on themselves and on their strengths while Sony for some reasons bets on copying what has already destroyed Xbox.
We get it, you love PlayStation, that doesn't change the fact that the current leadership sucks and is well on their way to kill the brand.
It's not our fault that Sony sucks, they chose that path.
The numbers just show one thing...
Nintendo needed Switch sucessor in 2024.
I have my doubts if they could push more two years with that.Looks like PS2 number will stay intact by NSW
I have my doubts if they could push more two years with that.
The issue is if the sales dropped to a level that even with more two years they can't catch PS2?
It is too risck.
They need to move to Switch sucessor asap... the delay to 2025 is not helping them.
My point is it is an amazing record if you reach there but it is worth to try to push to it forcing a extended life of Switch that will probably more harm the business than help? I don't think so.
Not entirely ture, a few of their heavy hitters (BotW, Odyssey, Switch Sports, etc.) went diwn to 30 dollars last Black Friday. I know because I brought them all sealed and they're already worth more than I paid even if long term hopes of becoming a millionaire off of that stuff is nonexistent.These are insane numbers, They have never gone on discount too which is even more impressive
BC hurting sales is a valid point unless there's a big price descrepency but we know Nintendo and there won't be.They can always give them hefty price cuts but it's not very Nintendo. Why the hell would I buy a switch right now at full price when switch 2 will have BC. Sales should fall from a cliff this year.
So much cope. If Sony games are profitable there is nothing stopping them from producing more games besides the fact that they don't want to expand.He didn't missed. Why Nintendo released more games than Sony? Guess what, their games surely don't consume such resources as Sony's games. You want more blockbuster games by Sony? Well, maybe they should switch to cute looking games.
Nintendo deserves all the smoke and criticism just like other companies do too.
Nintendo failed as a console maker though. It failed so much that it had to kill its home console business and shift entirely to handheld to save itself.
So much cope. If Sony games are profitable there is nothing stopping them from producing more games besides the fact that they don't want to expand.
If Sony games are too expensive to make or take too long that is their problem, a problem Nintendo was smart enough to avoid.
You speak as if Sony could release their own Mario, Zelda, Mario Kart, Pokemon, etc and are choosing not to do it when in fact Sony simply can't do it and rely on production value to drive demand for their games.
Just accept that Nintendo runs a better gaming business than PlayStation do and stop trying to dismiss what Nintendo has going on.
Like I said, as if not creating a success like Mario, Pokemon, etc, was something Sony was choosing not to do.It is not cope. If you want Sony to cut resources and produce more game to look cute, well, be my guess.
The main appeal of Sony games have had for a long time have been the production value of their games. You dismiss Nintendo development efforts without realizing that what they do is extremely hard. What other publisher is having similar success selling full priced games with simple graphics?Reading here that Nintendo was smart to avoid expensiveness ( obviously because weak and overpriced hardware ) of making advance looking games, would people complain if Sony is making a 1st party games which would look like Nintendo games and release it more? Which means greater amount of released games, but with dogshit graphics and performance.
The smoke I'm talking about is in perpetuity in regards to low end hardware/maximizing profits and rarely lowering prices. I care less about TOS and shutting down emulators thts what companies do to protect their assets. When the asuabs come with their bootleg Gucci bags raids happen and thy get shut down as thy are suppose to.But they haven't done much of late to earn the smoke other companies are getting IMHO.
At worst they're very aggressive about shutting down emulators profiting off their hardware and software, doing so supposedly in the name of "preservation". But I also can see that as them being protective of their IP, which they have every right to be protective of.
Well, really they merged their home & handheld lines into one product. But even with systems like Wii U, they didn't actually lose money. Wii U was pretty profitable for them because 1P software sales were extremely high on it.
Like I said, as if not creating a success like Mario, Pokemon, etc, was something Sony was choosing not to do.
The main appeal of Sony games have had for a long time have been the production value of their games. You dismiss Nintendo development efforts without realizing that what they do is extremely hard. What other publisher is having similar success selling full priced games with simple graphics?
What other publisher is having similar success selling full priced games with simple graphics?
Ewww hell no. I'm glad we have Sony for those high production games, once thts gone ill rarely game.He didn't missed. Why Nintendo released more games than Sony? Guess what, their games surely don't consume such resources as Sony's games. You want more blockbuster games by Sony? Well, maybe they should switch to cute looking games.
Reading here that Nintendo was smart to avoid expensiveness ( obviously because weak and overpriced hardware ) of making advance looking games, would people complain if Sony is making a 1st party games which would look like Nintendo games and release it more? Which means greater amount of released games, but with dogshit graphics and performance.