Weaker than a SteamdeckIs this good or nah
Niether Nintendo nor their fans are interested in AAA ports. Switch 2 doesn't need to match anything in the market. It just needs to be better than the Switch.People actually follow that douche?
I have no idea if these stats are good? Are the stats enough to run today's AAA games that are on PS/Xbox?
Is this good or nah
On the purple forum they say it's slightly above PS4 on handheld mode without DLSS.
And between PS4 pro and series S when docked.
Probably ~3x faster. Effectively more if you factor in DLSS.If one were to guess, is it a 50% jump? 100% jump?
That specs list points to them using two Micron LPDDR5X 7500MT/s 2*32bit in clamshell mode, but it's not certain.
If dual-channel LPDDR5X 7500MT/s means 2x32bit (60GB/s), we're looking at hardware that will be quite a bit slower than the original Steam Deck (88GB/s) in memory bandwidth, let alone the more recent chips on the ROG Ally X with 120GB/s.
It's nowhere near a PS4 if the memory only does 60GB/s, even if it does have more RAM. The base PS4 had 176GB/s memory bandwidth.
Weaker then base PS4, base PS4 has faster ram and more bandwidth. I'm guessing they will port the base PS4 version of COD to Switch 2. Switch 2 is certainly no match for PS4 Pro like rumors suggested.Weaker than a Steamdeck
Bandwidth needs depends of the resoltuion...It's nowhere near a PS4 if the memory only does 60GB/s, even if it does have more RAM. The base PS4 had 176GB/s memory bandwidth.
should’ve went with 16GB of RAM
On the purple forum they say it's slightly above PS4 on handheld mode without DLSS.
And between PS4 pro and series S when docked.
If that's the case then it's a pretty powerful handheld as of today. All the way through 2033... I am not so sure.