Bottlenecks are always a pain in the butt.Adding bottlenecks is never a good move, whether it be in the form of a narrow bus, a pool of slow RAM, or an under locked CPU.
Bottlenecks are always a pain in the butt.Adding bottlenecks is never a good move, whether it be in the form of a narrow bus, a pool of slow RAM, or an under locked CPU.
Mark Cerny has said his system design philosophy is to find potential bottlenecks in a design and eliminate them, and that seems to be the way to go, but some companies just want to make things as off-the-shelf as possible, and that’s a recipe for bottlenecks.Bottlenecks are always a pain in the butt.
Mark Cerny has said his system design philosophy is to find potential bottlenecks in a design and eliminate them, and that seems to be the way to go, but some companies just want to make things as off-the-shelf as possible, and that’s a recipe for bottlenecks.
Jaguar wasn’t even on par with the 3DO. It was a serious case of WTF engineering. All it had going for it was theoretical performance numbers for some of its raw parts, but assembled the way it was, the thing was USELESS.This era of gaming hardware was always interesting to me given that's where I started gaming. I actually like the PS1 aesthetic despite it not aging well in many cases. The Saturn has some interesting hardware quirks as well.
Even odd stuff like the Atari Jaguar seems like it may have been on par with stuff like the saturn and PS1 if it had a slightly better data bus.
Oh yeah, Jaguar definitely had a weird design. I was just thinking that with some slightly different design choices, some creative programming and a large enough budget. A Jaguar CD may have been able to do something just below a 3do or saturn.Jaguar wasn’t even on par with the 3DO. It was a serious case of WTF engineering. All it had going for it was theoretical performance numbers for some of its raw parts, but assembled the way it was, the thing was USELESS.
So, basically if the Atari Jaguar hadn’t been made by Atari and hadn’t been designed to be the Jaguar, it might not have been garbage. Gotcha.Oh yeah, Jaguar definitely had a weird design. I was just thinking that with some slightly different design choices, some crestive programming and a large enough budget. A Jaguar CD may have been able to do something just below a 3do or saturn.
I don't think the hardware was bad, just Atari's handling of it.So, basically if the Atari Jaguar hadn’t been made by Atari and hadn’t been designed to be the Jaguar, it might not have been garbage. Gotcha.
The hardware was total shit, which was why the games were almost total garbage.I don't think the hardware was bad, just Atari's handling of it.
Basically, I'm just saying that the hardware could have been used to put out 3d games with semi decent texture detail in the hands of a more competent company.
I recall seeing one at a show back in the days and being instantly disappointed.The hardware was total shit, which was why the games were almost total garbage.
When Acclaim, of all companies, cancels all development for a platform, you know it’s DOGSHIT.
The 3DO also wasn't done any favours by launching just before Sony dropped the bomb on the world of games hardware that was the live demo of the PlayStation's capabilities.I recall seeing one at a show back in the days and being instantly disappointed.
Eventually a friend of mine got one for his collection and we had the "chance" to try most of its library, what a disappointment! In some cases SNES games looked just as good.
The 3DO had the opposite effect, but its price tag put it in the same spot as the Neo-Geo.