I appreciate the write up and additional information.
I remain highly skeptical that, like xbox gamepass, that streaming remains a convenient option. Remember when digital was just a convenient option over physical? Now physical games are just a digital download code.
The 'benefit' of saving HDD space was a problem created when we were forced down the digital route instead of sticking with games. So now we are solving a problem we never had if we had stuck to the traditional way of playing. But hey, getting up and swapping discs was too difficult for that.
Thanks.
The thing is that big discs are too slow, and cards/cartridges that big are too expensive. So for big ass games in physical the best option to don't have too long loading times is to copy them to your SSD to speed up loading times. So now both digital and phisical take HDD space.
Unless they create some kind of new super fast, super high capacity and super cheap card (I think won't happen), we're stuck with the HDD space issue. At least the small percentage of users who like us buy a ton of games (not the case of the average user, who buys a couple games per year).
But even in my case, I prefer physical games but in a couple cases bought the game in digital because I knew I was going to be playing them for years while also playing other games, so I didn't want to be constantly swapping disks.
Regarding the convenience of cloud gaming, I think it is something they are starting to build for the future, to keep building and improving the tech and catalog getting market share for when it becomes important.
Right now, I have a great fiber connection and live in a big city with pretty likely a close server, because -at least when playing wired- I get an almost flawless experience, that I think will be good enough for most casual players.
In my specific case, I don't need to play at work (I now work at home remotely) or in another home or room, I always play on my main gaming setup. I no longer commute, so don't need a portable one. In general I now play less, so don't even use a big catalog from the game sub or to use cloud gaming. I simply buy the few games I play and play them locally.
But I think it's good to have more options, because some day I may need or will want to use them, in the same way that I almost don't play PS Plus games but in a few cases they include a game I'm really interested in and I play them (case of Stray, Virtua Fighter, Yakuza 0).
I also think this is only a first step: in the future, people who maybe doesn't have money to get a PS5 may use this to play PS5 games on a PS4 or a PC, highly increasing the amount of potential users who will be able to buy PS5 games.
Same goes with portability: Sony is working on cloud gaming over 5G. The 5G coverage and amount of devices that use it is very limited, but in the future will be mainstream. So you'll be able to play your PS5 games on a netbook, Steamdeck, Project Q-like device, etc. via cloudgaming in decent conditions without requiring a wired connection.
Sure, may not be the most optimal way, but I can see myself using it in cases like when making a -not frequent- trip or commute or when doing some vacations.
Buy a Ps sub so that I can pay my isp the privilege of streaming games when I'm on a holiday I've paid money to enjoy?
You pay your ISP for internet connection, other than that they have nothing to do with what you do with your internet connection.
You pay Sony for their games, hardware and services.
One of these services is PS Plus, where you pay Sony (not your ISP) to basically rent over 900 games and optionally streming them -plus now some digital PS5 games you may have bought- from Sony cloud gaming servers, plus also to use the Sony servers for online multiplayer in paid games.
The servers -particularly cloud gaming ones- are too fucking expensive, and publishers & devs need to be paid for their games plus allso Sony does their job on the related paperwork, marketing, signing more games, updating the pages etc. I think that money you pay to Sony for Plus is well spent and deserved.
If you're gaming at work you should be sacked.
Obviously I mean in rest time, like lunch hours or afterworks.
I return to my previous point, why not just locally load the games on your device? 256GB micro sd cards are cheap as chips.
Your smartphone/tablet/PC/smart tv doesn't run native PS5 games.
And regarding using microsd, a 256GB costs around 25-30 bucks versus a few cents that BD costs. If people almost rioted for a $10 price increase in some games, imagine if you tell them to increase the price $20 or $30 bucks more.
MicroSDs also have a speed of 100 or 200 MB/s. The PS5 SDD loads at up to 21GB/s (raw speed of 5.5GB/s).
How many games do you need to play at once? Considering that the most popular games like fortnite, cod, apex legends, make up the vast majority of game time, do you need access to 200 games?
In my case normally only a couple, sometimes 3. Not counting the ones I play due to work or to provide feedback or mentoring to other dev friends.
In my case spent most of my time in past years with Street Fighter V, now the next ones will be with Street Fighter 6.
For me the default storage size of a console is enough, I have enough space to keep there some favorite games plus some recent ones in case I may eventually go back to play them. When I run out of space I delete some games I didn't play in months or years and that's all.