Star Wars Jedi Survivor Performance Review - PS5 vs PC vs Xbox Series X|S
- Thread starter Ezekiel
- Start date
PS5 performance 18% better than Series X.
Expected because it is basically shows the difference between TFLOPs that is around 16%.
Expected because it is basically shows the difference between TFLOPs that is around 16%.
It is not the best of the engines (I mean it is not specialized in anything)… wants to do to everything in every platform that ends being generic and with issues.
But the worst issues are the famous shader compilation… thankful we console players are out of that.
Summary :
AnOtHeR oNe
This is a shocking experience in performance mode on everything.
Lmao, great start. I called it, way too much hype about UE5 and too little games actually released.
UE5 game.
The age of 1080p 30fps pushing graphics to max is back.
When Epic showed the Matrix demo that was already expected… to archive that level of graphics it will need to trade off resolution and performance.
But who remember that GAF thread where everybody just closed the eyes and started to attack me for saying the same
www.neogaf.com
The age of 1080p 30fps pushing graphics to max is back.
When Epic showed the Matrix demo that was already expected… to archive that level of graphics it will need to trade off resolution and performance.
But who remember that GAF thread where everybody just closed the eyes and started to attack me for saying the same
Opinion - Is 60 FPS killing overall graphical fidelity?
jep, I am boycotting everything 30fps. it's about principles here. also with Sony going in on PC, there won't be many console exclusive games anymore soon hopefully I boycutted 30fps in 2017. Just like listening to 128kbps mp3's/streams and watching 720p movies and shows. It's good to have...
Last edited:
Which game from Insommiac looks better than this?
While the performance is not there… this game is absolutely a looker. Miles Morales doesn’t come close to it in visual terms.
BTW I will buy it… looks like the best Star War game if not ever at least in the last two decade… 86 on meta with very few reviewed below 80 score.
Last edited:
Are you playing on PC? Looks to me their focus were not PC at all.
Said that they released an apology and commitment to fix all issues on PC.
Yes Pc but it doesnt matter. xbox series and Pc are pretty much the same dx12 path, on xbox its worse since its only using zen 2 thats why its capped at 30 fps since uncapped it cant reach more, i bet its even dropping below 30. when im dropping on a ryzen 5600 to the 40fps mark with only running around thats it, and that cpu is much faster than a zen 2 laptop cpu with 45 watts limit in the series consoles.
thats the reason the ps5 is faster than the xbox albeit having better hardware. Playstations api is the best on the market, vulkan is the closest you will ever get on PC, on ps4 it was already better than what there is on pc, and it surely advanced into the ps5 life cycle.
Playstation operates like a classic console much more efficient, xbox is simply a pc, thats easy to make games for xbox and pc at the same time but its not as efficient as the way the playstaion handles it. thats why pc gamer need often power to brute force games in comparison.
thats also the reason sony ports for pc are very time consuming and difficulty. i could also explain why the pc ports from ps games need so much vram on pc but yea it boils down to the same in the end.
