Not if it doesn't affect the greater creative vision.
You guys want to look at real creative censorship? Go look at the history of films like Come and See. Where a government straight up banned production on it for several years because they didn't like the message (anti-war) it had. The people calling these super-small changes with SB censorship in comparison, sound like actual crying babies.
Yes even then actually. If someone other than the artist is forcing aesthetic changes relating to objectionable content, that's a form of censorship whether or not the artist goes on to say the forcibly edited product still falls in line with a stated vision.
And nobody is saying there aren't greater examples of censorship, there quite obviously have been, and yes at the end of the day this doesn't really change a whole lot about the product. But it is quite silly in my mind to want to cover up hips, legs and a bit of cleavage in a game where you have effectively the option to walk around literally nude, and that they have been advertising with ass cheeks since day 1. It's silly and should be called out as such. Game still seems pretty dope, waiting for my copy from Amazon.