But this time it includes sites that has nothing to do with gaming like pride etcGrummz is full of shit here. Yeah, its voted on by gaming outlets and general outlets with gaming coverage, always has been.
Because Pride.com reviews video games, and the jury is basically just a collection of gaming media and influencers. We can see based on inclusions like Wall Street Journal that these outlets do not have to be exclusively gaming focused.How can they get in?
Thats only like a fraction of their partBecause Pride.com reviews video games, and the jury is basically just a collection of gaming media and influencers. We can see based on inclusions like Wall Street Journal that these outlets do not have to be exclusively gaming focused.
The jury selection team likely felt it appropriate to have a panel of judges with a diverse collection of perspectives on gaming.
I clicked the link, its a gay culture site that does game reviews among other things. There's a zillion outlets that each get one vote in the TGAs, having them there is no more having it rigged than, say, having all of those foreign language sites is rigging it towards a game from one of their countries or having all of the console-specific sites is rigging it towards their console. I attacked him because he's the person cited in the OP, you did actually read it, right?But this time it includes sites that has nothing to do with gaming like pride etc
How can they get in?
Anyway why gamers here attacking grumz? Hes the guys exposing these stuff
And hes not the only one spoke about this, why only attack him and ignore the others
The selective hate is getting really suspicious
Do you agree with me if i say that popularity and fame made you easy target for hatred or envy around hereI attacked him because he's the person cited in the OP, you did actually read it, right?
edit: Oh, "read the OP", I guess you actually are the OP. I dunno, buddy, maybe I responded directly to the thing you posted.
Well, it is called Pride.com, so you'd sort of anticipate content created or enjoyed by the LGBTQ+ community would be featured on their outlet.The entire sites was built to push lgbt narratives
Theres plenty other sites like gamespot etc that are more dedicated for gaming that should be more representable for the game award
They are rigged but not in that sense. Elden Ring DLC is eligible for GOTY so it will fracture the vote between Astrobot and FF7R.
They won't let a PS5-exclusive win.
At the end of the day, if they truly wanted to rig the awards to push an agenda, they wouldn't bother with selecting diverse jurors. The voting is all submitted anonymously, so they would just fake the numbers. Or, even more directly, they wouldn't bother with voting at all. They'd just give it to whomever they wanted.
Do you not know what the LA Times or Variety are? Those are absolutely acceptable sources for this.Just have a look at some of those sites
News from California, across the nation and world - Los Angeles Times
The L.A. Times is a leading source of breaking news, entertainment, sports, politics, and more for Southern California and the world.www.latimes.com
Variety
Entertainment news, film reviews, awards, film festivals, box office, entertainment industry conferencesvariety.com
Gay Pride - LGBT and Queer Voices
Pride.com is the socially-driven epicenter of original video, photography and editorial, where all young LGBTQ+ people can find stories to share and connect with people like them.www.pride.com
Doesnt look like a site that dedicated for gaming neither should represent gamers opinion on the best videogame this year
Dude, he's the guy in your fucking post. He absolutely is viable as a target for my posting seeing as so much absolute bullshit goes through his account. Don't fucking post something if you aren't able to defend it.Do you agree with me if i say that popularity and fame made you easy target for hatred or envy around here
Like when you only attack grummz and ignore the other guys reporting the same thing