Halfway through it. Will go back to it after Dragon Age and Black Ops 6 campaign. It looks great and better than the first game, audio is good voice acting wise but the voices in your head have overstayed their welcome, story is equal to the first game but the combat is two steps backwards. The way I rate games, as of now, graphics - 9.0/10, audio - 7.0/10, gameplay - 5.0/10, story - 7.0/10. Overall - 7.0/10.
I do prefer Ryse: Son of Rome and The Order: 1886 over Hellblade 2. They kinda all have the same issues. Looks great, sounds great for the most part, story/characters is good and keeps you interested but the gameplay/combat leaves a lot to be desired.
So you played hellblade 2 for 2-3 hours and gave up?
As someone who rated The Order: 1886 a good 7.0/10, it has issues beyond the short run time which didn't apply to me as it took me 12-14 hours to complete. The issues with the game had to do more with all the boss fights being bad, a few chapters just being cut scenes and it having black bars on the top and bottom of the screen didn't help matters especially during gameplay/combat because enemies in the background especially those in an elevated position, you couldn't shoot at until you moved up closer. So while I always wanted a sequel especially since it ends on a cliffhanger, it was like Ryse: Son of Rome for Xbox One, a visual technical showcase. It wasn't meant to be an amazing game. It was meant to show you what the console was capable of.
So you play one game for 12-14 hours, complete the game.
You deduct points from one game for black bars but not the other.
But a game with worse combat, worse boss battles that you only played for 2-3 hours. Has the same score according to you?
I hope you'll raise your bar when you get the ps5 pro today. No more stanning.