Maybe MS should've went after them instead lol
Maybe MS should've went after them instead lol
No lie ubisoft content would fit a subscription model pretty well.I agree 100%.
I think their biggest studios are all in Canada. They even have a school there with government programs so I guess they are stuck with these massive studios if they want to get these tax cuts.They really didn't. After 4 it was all downhill to the point where they purposely stopped doing the yearly releases and instead revamped the whole series with Origins, releasing three successful games which had an entirely different play-style and two year release cycle. This fixed their AC problem, though the latest title has experienced delays related to, probably, a combo of Covid, Ubi-bloat and Ubi-infighting about what the franchise should be like. Now though, they are going to run this shit into the ground with no fewer than three differently focused AC titles releasing within the same two year period (an old-style AC set in Baghdad, a new-style AC set in the age of witch hunts and a "different"-style game set in feudal Japan.) Any one of those on its own could be good but they are absolutely going to cannibalize sales like that and dilute the brand to nothing-ness.
Anyways, as alluded to above, I think Ubisoft is fucked. Believe it or not I keep a big chart of what studios each publisher owns and what games they are working on and Ubisoft just.... it just can't stop spending on shitty tax-payer funded support studios that have headcounts in the hundreds and yet don't actually put out games on their own. The smart move would be mass layoffs but, and this is just suspicions based on experience here, I don't think that Ubisoft actually can do that at their newer, shittier, locations without breaking employment/tax deals they've signed with local governments. Those albatross studios literally have to stay around Ubi's neck or else they will owe taxes and fees on things they otherwise were not being taxed on. And the fact that they don't let individual studios have recognizable brands or control their own IP (outside of Red Storm and even then...) means that the parts of it that are good aren't as marketable as they otherwise should be. They have no equivalent to "a Rare game", "a Naughty Dog game", "a Bioware game", "a Rocksteady game."
A decade ago everyone was rooting for the Guillemonts to fight off that Vivendi acquisition. These days I think people should actively be rooting for a buyout from, well, anyone (I don't think any of the three traditional platform owners are interested, though I guess I could see people rooting against a bid from, like, Amazon or Netflix.)
No lie ubisoft content would fit a subscription model pretty well.
No lie ubisoft content would fit a subscription model pretty well.
Well, in fact a big chunk of it already is integrated in PS+ Extra and they keep adding games almost every month.They do have Ubisoft+ which is coming to Xbox and PlayStation soon. My guess is that it gets revealed/detailed at their E3 Showcase. Best of all, it will include their games and DLC day one. Can't wait!!!
Yes, they have over 20000 workers in over 40 offices across the entire world, but around a third of this people is in Canada (mostly in their Montreal and Toronto studios, but they have some more) because the tax cuts they offered at least in the past. These tax cuts are the reason of why many AAA companies have big studios there.I think their biggest studios are all in Canada. They even have a school there with government programs so I guess they are stuck with these massive studios if they want to get these tax cuts.
At least their development budget should be cheap if some of the salaries are paid by the gov.
Nah, Ubi never wanted to sell. And less to someone like MS.Maybe MS should've went after them instead lol
Well, in fact a big chunk of it already is integrated in PS+ Extra and they keep adding games almost every month.
Yes, this is the ideaTrue. Same on Xbox. However, Ubisoft will be bringing Ubisoft+ as a separate subscription service (similar to EA Play) to both Xbox and PlayStation. The main difference is that Ubisoft has confirmed twice that their games will be available on Ubisoft+ day one including DLC and expansions where as with Plus/Game Pass, it's basically their Vault games with the one exception being Rainbow Six Extraction a year ago.
It’s an arms race that’s what it isNobody should be trying to buy Ubisoft, one of the most bog standard 3rd parties to ever exist. MS has poised the gaming industry well (and some of your brains) with this acquisition nonsense.
If you go ahead and sort out the Japanese groups like EPD (which is really 10/11 separate studios that just share a name/location) then Ubisoft Montreal is actually the biggest game studio in the entire world. It has something like 4000 employees, meaning its about 40 percent large as the entirety of EA or Activision. Its what all of their other tax-break studios have been (unsuccessfully) modeled on.I think their biggest studios are all in Canada. They even have a school there with government programs so I guess they are stuck with these massive studios if they want to get these tax cuts.
At least their development budget should be cheap if some of the salaries are paid by the gov.
Problem is ubisoft has a management issue, the exact same thing plaguing xbox right now. Can't imagine how much more of a disaster it would be under MS.Maybe MS should've went after them instead lol
I see it more like Ubisoft has a lot of potential, but it will take a company with more focus and resources to really bring that potential out.Nobody should be trying to buy Ubisoft, one of the most bog standard 3rd parties to ever exist. MS has poised the gaming industry well (and some of your brains) with this acquisition nonsense.
Analists saw how Assassins Creed did and figured that all games could make as much money if they were the same but under a different skin.Dunno why they had to homogenize it all..... made it all boring.