They’re trying their best to hide the utter failure of the Xbox division from shareholders.For the past 10 years, Microsoft has been a blur when it comes to talking about real sales figures, whether for games, consoles or subscriptions.
They’re trying their best to hide the utter failure of the Xbox division from shareholders.For the past 10 years, Microsoft has been a blur when it comes to talking about real sales figures, whether for games, consoles or subscriptions.
Now this is actually interesting. I did wonder about the rush to walk back the 30 million subscriber number and it makes perfect sense if MS wants to inflate the percentage growth of gamepass in their next quarterly financials.
That is really weird and means the numbers are struggling even more to grow.Xbox Game Pass has 'over 30 million' subscribers, according to this LinkedIn profile (update)
Microsoft's previous official milestone was 25 million, but will Xbox Game Pass Core count toward that number?www.windowscentral.com
Update: Since publishing, the LinkedIn account in question removed references to Xbox Game Pass hitting 30 million. Microsoft also sent us a statement to reiterate the previous 25 million milestone as being the official tally.
Nobody would be able to game the system if shareholders were that bright.I refuse to believe shareholders don’t know the actual situation with Xbox. Like Phil being vague to the media is one thing but him lying to shareholders and them not asking questions would be something. I do think it odd though that this the first real peak behind the curtain since January 2022 of gamepass suscribers and the silence is deafening from the usually obnoxiously loud fanboys.
The numbers where made up… MS themselves gone public to say it is 25 million… basically no grow.Amazing growth for gamepass right there!
I wonder how many mau they have!
The significance of the magic 30 million subs mark is that it is, according to Phil Spencer, the point where Game Pass will be sustainable.I don't get the hype over GP subs anyway, so what if it was 30m? It's a lower barrier to entry service that is marginally larger than their console userbase (still below PS5 userbase, still below PS+ subs) who cares? I subbed (thanks free trial) to play Starfield but that provided Microsoft $0 in revenue and isn't going to keep me as a long term customer in the way a console, or game library (Steam), would.
I don't know how they expect it to make it profitable... I don't know that MS cares this much, most of their products loose money (at least it was like that a couple of years ago)... So loosing a little bit, like on many other products, can be considered a "win" for them I guess.The significance of the magic 30 million subs mark is that it is, according to Phil Spencer, the point where Game Pass will be sustainable.
Not profitable, sustainable.
I don't know how they expect it to make it profitable
And it's the same for gaming, I guarantee by end of 2024, EA and Ubisoft will shutdown their subscription services or at least stop day and date releases. The idiots at Sony have also fallen for the trap, even though they're not doing day and date, cutting the legs off of their games after only a year or 2 will hurt them in the long run.In TV/Film there is not debate. subservices have been the Pandora's box.
the irony is that Sony is the only one doing it right.And it's the same for gaming, I guarantee by end of 2024, EA and Ubisoft will shutdown their subscription services or at least stop day and date releases. The idiots at Sony have also fallen for the trap, even though they're not doing day and date, cutting the legs off of their games after only a year or 2 will hurt them in the long run.
They're rolling everything up as Azure sub-clients aren't they?They’re trying their best to hide the utter failure of the Xbox division from shareholders.