Sure It's just another one of those 1st party XGS not delivering on the promises. And this one I fault more cause it was acquired among those prior to the launch of the box. Scope became smaller over the initial promise of Skyrim alongside the art style change so it's disappointing. I have no gripes with it just as a dev be upfront and honest with we prioritised 30 fps for polish instead of a 1st person game doesn't need 60 fps.
What in the actual fuck did this man smoke before saying this?
i would say otherwise should be the case, 3rd person is more forgiven, as 1st person can induce people with motion sickness.30 fps on a first person game?
Yeap... I could understand this claim if they where really pushing visuals a la Crysis in 2007 but with these two decade old visuals?
The funny part to me is how their fans hyped up every new acquisition and every previous XGS studio to somehow make SSM, insomniac, and Naughty Dog tier games. It's why starfield was so hyped... they were the only ones that could've achieved something like that.
and people trying to make an argument as whole industry is shifting.. like get the fuck out of here..
I used to always argue that PS4 was better than Xbox One because it didn't need to deal with all that DirectX abstraction overhead, and that the programmers were able to access the hardware more directly and people ridiculed me for saying that. Now that we have confirmation that the PS5 can have games perform better with weaker hardware due to its lower-level APIs, all I can do is sit back and laugh.
i watched it too. first few minutes were bad. laggy, combat very basic, game looks very outdated and stiff. never ever i would tell that they belong to one of the biggest companies in the world. game looks like indie.
Well... Obsidian is AA at best.
Seriously.. Also the movement is weird as all hell, the player locomotion is lethargic and the platform jumping seems like the player character is an 85 year-old man
Not necessarily false, but definitely exaggerated.
