The opening to replace CoD is now. Sony or some other publisher should clone it and adopt a better business model than anual releases.
Yurinka said:This isn't the case at all, it would be retarded. CoD and Blizzard make a ton of money. ABK always had contractors and outsourcing, and will continue having them. They only fired a small percent of the company, pretty likely redundant positions and some underperforming people.
I mean thts how COD was until Activision branded them off years ago.TheGhostofHope also stated that it wouldn't be a shock to anyone if Microsoft merges the COD studios. For example, Raven and Treyarch would be combined into one and vice versa with Sledgehammer and Infinity Ward. COD development currently operate at a full 2 years cycle in which the 3 studios rotate every year for a new COD release and with this possible change and larger focus on contract workers (hi, Halo Infinite), Call of Duty under Microsoft will be developed in 18 months. Xbox really is the McDonald/fast food of the game industry.
Imagine 343 getting rope in to help make COD moving forward.I mean thts how COD was until Activision branded them off years ago.
Maybe the post was deleted because someone told him the fact that ABK already has been using external contractors/outsourcing studios since forever, making him look dumb.
As an example here in Spain there was Elite 3D (now 2K Valencia) who did work in many CoD games, Crash Bandicoot 4 or Diablo series to name a few of them.
To have contractors / external outsourcing studios is super common for AAA gaming, also for AA or even some indies.
In the context of an acquisition is common to fire people due to redundant positions and also underperforming people (and pretty likely later replace a portion of them) to reduce costs.
This isn't the case at all, it would be retarded. CoD and Blizzard make a ton of money. ABK always had contractors and outsourcing, and will continue having them. They only fired a small percent of the company, pretty likely redundant positions and some underperforming people.
OH hell nooo!Imagine 343 getting rope in to help make COD moving forward.
Very true. Words of wisdom.Nearly spat out my coffee reading this on that other site...slimysnake actually said something sensible (and concise):
Because owning access to mobile devices is worth more than console games. Think of the mobile games market Vs console market.If this is the plan then if anything the layoffs were too small. Maybe they really did just want King? But then why fight so hard and give up so much for the rest of it?
They could have had that two years ago for less money with no strings attached if they had agreed to sell off the CoD portion of ABK (so basically if they had just brought Blizzard and King.)Because owning access to mobile devices is worth more than console games. Think of the mobile games market Vs console market.
After the Black Ops remakes COD will be a shell of what it once was. Ms gonna kill this like they did with HaloThere are enough COD games already, like 20 of them and 10 of them probably still got servers online generating money, i'm sure nobody will miss it if 1 of them is not out this year at all
After the Black Ops remakes COD will be a shell of what it once was. Ms gonna kill this like they did with Halo