Yes but my comment is aimed at defining what "good" is instead of it being cope about "I had fun." We saw that cope in Starfield. Visual performance is a substantial factor to how we should think about games.
Well yeah I bought TOTK and it is a great game. Xenoblade Chronicles 2 and 3 are also great games, but they have terrible visual performance. If they were on PS4/5 they would have looked better and been better games. I don't think they're bad because of this, but the industry is broad and games need to be viewed with their contemporaries. Sure, if a game comes from a good studio and the quality drops it matters, but what you're saying is we can forgive those quality drops in other situations. My suggestion is that we don't do that and keep a consistent focus on visual quality regardless.