There's also the matter of whether the CMA had any separate hearings with Sony about their thoughts on the remedies, potentially giving Sony the opportunity to reassure them that their stance against behavioral remedies in the PF is the correct one. I think those people may be gleaning too much from the limited information they were given and that these deals they are signing atm are to win over the EC more so than the CMA.I saw a idas post a few days back about most of the CMA hearing with MS going into discussing behavioural remedies, can't remember which outlet was reporting it. People seem to be taking that as a good sign of the CMA accepting behavioural remedies, I don't see it that way.
MS have obviously rejected structural remedies, so CMA spending the entire hearing asking them about structural remedies is a waste of time, so they will obviously hear them out on the behavioural remedies. If CMA did spend most the hearing pressuring MS about the structural remedies rather then hearing what they had to offer, MS could go bitch about that if they appealed to CAT.
CMA is obviously covering their own backs and leaving no room for MS to use that against them.
Last edited: