Some ppl do but I have merged four threads. News is news and it's OK as long as they are seperate topics.Of course but in this case no one cares enough about CoD here to warrant this persistent coverage.
Some ppl do but I have merged four threads. News is news and it's OK as long as they are seperate topics.Of course but in this case no one cares enough about CoD here to warrant this persistent coverage.
It's the only game you could fit on a Series S
I agree. Sometimes there are so many threads created. It could easily be just an update on an existing thread. Bump it with new info.Of course but in this case no one cares enough about CoD here to warrant this persistent coverage.
If you think MAYBE this is a rip-off, you’re not thinking hard enough, and if you didn’t see this pattern forming over the last five years, you just haven’t paid attention.Exactly! It's not like the campaign bar is that high but when you initially hear the game is going to be dlc and then the company says they instead are going to release a whole game but see this shortened campaign, it makes you do a double take and think "are they ripping me off" and it seems that might be the case. We don't pay a now more expensive $70 to get less or at least we shouldn't!!! That is the point.
BTW sone COD games in the past have had some solid campaigns.
It will get worseI imagine it will only stay like this or get worse under Microsoft...
This is nothing new so why are people disappointed in the length there campaigns have always been quick to beat in under 4 hours. Even playing g on a harder difficulty.
I think it was going down this path with or without MS buying Activision.I imagine it will only stay like this or get worse under Microsoft...
Yeah more piecemeal bs instead.Heard this campaign doesn't even have big moment set pieces which is crazy. Set pieces are staples of COD campaign. Lol.