Good luck getting a responseWhat's your criticism about the gameplay?
Good luck getting a responseWhat's your criticism about the gameplay?
What can they do at this point?The studio is ignoring all criticism and don't seem to care that it will be a bomb
This was the same dialog around Suicide Squad. Nothing wrong with pointing out mediocrity or games tht arent really wanted by gamers or just ppl giving opinions. Companies need to know what gamers want so thy don't keep churning out stuff we don't want.Nobody?...not one person preordered it. The pains of shit reporting. Hyperbolic shite reporting. It reads like shit AI.
Weird seeing the joy of wanting a game to fail. It's pathetic. That's not me looking for comments from the two on this board currently hate wanking to it.
And that's where they messed up by debuting the game with such a long cinematic trailer. You set the game up instantly because nobody is gonna care about these characters if there's really no story for them to play.What can they do at this point?
They cant delay it to make changes. Ultimately it needs a SP/Coop campaign so alot of the PS fanbase can buy into it. And then carry on the story through PVP and PVE like planned. And its too late for character changes I believe.
This is also a reason Publishers need to show there games from way out like normal.
Independent testing must not have had many complaints or certain people at the studio are stubborn and stupid enough to not change them. Ive worked with similar studios so normally they take the criticism to heart and make changes as much as they can.
They got the gameplay and gunplay down for me
The saddest part is no one is claiming the game plays perfect so it's an open a goal as anyone can imagine to use any legitimate criticism. Still no responseGood luck getting a response
Because it was never about the game or gameplay. We know exactly what they want changed...The saddest part is no one is claiming the game plays perfect so it's an open a goal as anyone can imagine to use any legitimate criticism. Still no response
What should they do? Create a slew of new whiter straight only characters to appease you?
What exactly is wrong with the game? It's already more polished than most games out there lol.
Many games are delayed, so they would have delayed this one if considered it made sense. If they didn't delay it's because:They cant delay it to make changes.
In genres like hero shooter games it's very important to have characters that are appealing to the player.What should they do? Create a slew of new whiter straight only characters to appease you?
What exactly is wrong with the game? It's already more polished than most games out there lol.
Emari - for sure needs an overhaul along with DaVeers, I dunno why she's buried in that space suite when she's kinda serving face card .Probably like some are saying, more attractive characters. It doesnt bother me much. But some seem to have a must for it. Not every game needs to be Stellar Blade for me.
Probably change up some for sure though. For example, Id change something about
Star Childs - look and head. Something is just missing and off
Lark - ( my guy ) needs some more work to be more than just a groot rip off
Emari - Close that helmet cover lol. Maybe something like the Stray NPC’s screen faces, to show facial expressions
Danvers - Make her hot lol
IT-Z - Better clothes and face needed.
Lennox - Change of Colour would be fine.
Teo - His body seem off. Maybe a bit taller upper body
Bazz - Change the glasses for sure
Daw - Lol just change it
Roka, Vale, Jabali, Kyps, Duchess are all fine. People probably wouldnt complain about the others if there was some attractive characters.
Neymar too.
Its very polished and smooth for me too.
Full steam ahead for PlayStation, it seems..
Good gameplay was not enough to get people on board. The free beta had such poor numbers.Good luck getting a response
I mean theres not much time to add a campaign.Many games are delayed, so they would have delayed this one if considered it made sense. If they didn't delay it's because:
- They are fine with the game as it is and don't think it needs a delay
- They think the game needs some important improvement somewhere but think that can be released after launch, and that delaying it would have no positive effect
- They think the game needs some important improvement somewhere but maybe too big to be fixed in the period of a normal delay
In genres like hero shooter games it's very important to have characters that are appealing to the player.
So it's pretty dumb to make the entire roster designed to -on purpose- don't be appealing to the biggest demographic group of the genre.
So yes, to include several hetero friendly white badass guys and hot chicks would help. Many PS/Sony fans are SP only players, so to have a proper SP campaign would help too.
Many people complains about it being an Overwatch (in a few cases also mentioning other games)/Guardians of the Galaxy ripoff, so something to make it more unique would help too.
Let's fix it a bit here...Good gameplay was not enough to get people on board. The free beta had such poor numbers on Steam.
The game was getting bashed the minute it got announced before y'all had steam numbers, so what now?Good gameplay was not enough to get people on board. The free beta had such poor numbers.
The game and studio are getting bashed endlessly.
So the issues must be something else?
There is a live service graveyard with many flops laid to rest in it. The industry is brutal.
Blizzard doesn't want Concord to pose any threat to their game.
Overwatch 2 Has Clearly Targeted Concord Using Their Latest Support Hero, Juno - Gameranx
Blizzard has clearly targeted Concord by scheduling their test period and launch for their new hero Juno to match up with Concord's dates.gameranx.com
Gamers are unforgiving and have no time to play so many mp games.
I hope Concord succeeds without any changes. But if it doesn't, I don't want to see any potential layoffs.
Yes. I think they don't want to include any of the three points, and in case they'd want to include them they only would have time to include the characters in case they'd have them already implemented because they had planned them to be included just a few months after launch.I mean theres not much time to add a campaign.
Characters maybe but its coming out next month.
And yes they probably dont want to change alot too.
I agree on the points.
I think the Campaign would of made it different to other hero shooters, the quality is there. It also would of got SP fans potential to try the PVP and get into it. Maybe some more unique PVP modes, but we havent tried them all yet.
To be fair, most of the people doing it was already doing it before seeing the first video of the game.The game and studio are getting bashed endlessly.
Full steam ahead for PlayStation, it seems..
Buying a studio before they haven’t released a game isn’t a bad idea. You can get them very cheap it is a gamble but looking at Concord it just isn’t it. There’s no way Herman/Jim saw Concord & said yeah these mid character design whose personality resembles the D team Marvel guardian galaxy is a bad idea. Concord doesn’t resemble the Marvel avengers but the Marvel Guardians a sector in Marvel that has its own niche compared to the main heroes.Well if Sony learns something from this then it would be a good albeit expensive lesson-
1. Don't buy studios before they launch games (Especially stay away from games from studios that Herman thinks are good)
2. Don't ever employ the character design team as well as the senior leadership from firewalk across their studios ever again.
3. Bring something unique or use a well known IP if you just want a clone
4. This should be a last resort but moneyhat GaaS games if your own studios can't make competent ones
They wanted the PC money so now they have to be prepared for being clowned on when the games have low CCU's on Steam, greed has consequences.