The clowning doesn't stop, won't stop. Bethesda has had heat on them for this over a decade and they suddenly think folks are gonna continue to give them a pass? Now that they're first-party and their games exclusive even less so. WTF?
Lmao, so many excuses.
Not an excuse, it's a fact.
Models, textures, hair, lighting, shadows and basically all kind of postprocessing and visual tech related stuff is way better in Starfield. It's basically 2 generations above:Well this is a NPC.
It's an excuse, it's their choice to create them like that. Have you seen Unreal MetaHuman? Please stop covering for Bethesda technical incompetence.
When you are playing the game and are on the 200th planet sure the npc quality wouldn't matter much, but if you are showing them in the big showcase for your game maybe choose better ones or maybe made by a person
I'm very suspicious about those claims of scale. I predict mostly uninteresting world with barren and procedurally generated. Skyrim and Fallout 3 were already full of absurd low quality content.come on man, but the SCALE
Thats exactly how it is going to be and unlike nms i don't think they are going to give free updates for so long, they might add a city or two and some questlines but in the end they are just depending on the modders to do their work for them
Well it takes one shit developer to truly recognize another shit developerWasn’t their game rated really bad due to how terrible the game was and how bad it performed on PC lolI knew it would end up here and people are taking it and running with it. Never fails
These games have hand made characters, not producerally generated ones that can be made with a character editor. If something you should compare Starfield to No Man's Sky.
Yes, I saw and used Unreal Metahuman. But in addition to see them in a cinematic with only a single character, I also saw them used as NPC characters in a work-in-progress game, where they don't look that good with gameplay textures, lighting, level of detail, shadows, etc.
