Or Destin told her. He's holding a higher position at IGN and he's the second biggest MS cocksucker, right behind colt.Already has. She's protected her tweets, no doubt because the xbox cultists are attacking her.
Or Destin told her. He's holding a higher position at IGN and he's the second biggest MS cocksucker, right behind colt.Already has. She's protected her tweets, no doubt because the xbox cultists are attacking her.
You are the shill, and a very médiocre and predictable onenever even heard of axios.
And why wouldn’t MS send out a review copy to windows central? Are you claiming Sony only provides review copies to independent sites?
Is Gamespot, ign, and game informer MS shills?
The worst part about it is then they do the classic Xbox fanboy projection and accuse other people of the very thing they're guilty of. Like the "Sony exclusives get 5 points on metacritic because of media bias" when it's actually the opposite, Sony exclusives get judged harsher because they're held to a higher standard and Xbox games get pity points/paid shills upping the scoreThere's something I noticed for at least the last decade, all the Xbox centric sites almost always rate Microsoft games higher than everyone else.
Like you can go look at metacritic for pretty much any MS game and see the top 10 - 20 highest reviews will be from Xbox sites.
No one ever really mentions it but its very noticeablecable if you just go look at them on metacritic.
I always wanted to figure out what the scores would be without those scores but it would yake forever to do.
I know Playstation and Nintendo have their dedicated sites too but its no where near as egregious and obvious as Xbox sites
Going by the activity on twitter and all these reviewer's saying they wrote massive reviews and recorded huge videos, I can almost guarantee that that's part of the "review contract".
I'm also updating my metacritic prediction to 94.
Agree.
They aren’t even hiding it.
So obvious it will get huge scores.
Anybody who thinks this shit is normal and not some part of the review contract needs to have their brain donated to science
Anybody who thinks this shit is normal and not some part of the review contract needs to have their brain donated to science
They will use the excuse "bethesdas biggest game ever" to overlook the flaws.
Maybe it's just the sales pitch of that guy. I've written huge TLDRs here on inconsequential topics. I think if I were really passionate about writting reviews I would definitely get up there on some games. I don't think Starfield deserves that however, thus I lean on agreeing with you.
MS shills right now:Or Destin told her. He's holding a higher position at IGN and he's the second biggest MS cocksucker, right behind colt.
You mean the link tweets? They're all tweets by individuals working for the outlets in question commenting on the fact that they too haven't gotten the codes (at least at the time the tweets took place). That's the confirmation and source. Not all come in the form of an article.You need to expand the text @KnittedKnight , there's multiple tweets with all but the same content.
So it seems the game is going to land at an 86/87 MC and OC for both Xbox consoles and PC (currently 87 MC, but could drop to an 86 MC). There's a good bulk of reviews, actually, at least on the OC side. It's usually much easier to bring a score average down than up once you have 30 - 40+ reviews already accounted for.
Overall, Starfield seems like it'll be a fun, adventurous space-based open-world WRPG with quality content and features, but it's no GOTG-tier heavyweight, and probably won't win many GOTY awards. But the real question is, does it genuinely represent a positive shift for Xbox 1P content going forward? We'll have to wait for longer-term fanbase reception and sales/revenue numbers before being able to answer that question.
I would like to think it is representative of such a shift; at the same time a lot of the reviews out there could be obfuscating things similar to the high praise Halo Infinite got ~ 2 years ago, hence why it's best to wait a bit before seeing the bigger picture. Microsoft doesn't have many (if any) big heavyweight 1P titles that reach mass appeal and are strongly associated with Microsoft/Xbox rather than being seen as multiplatform IP (such as the case with Minecraft); Starfield could be the beginning of seeing that shift into something more favorable, so let's see how things go.