At the end of the day, sony is out to make money with their acquisitions, it doesn’t really make sense to buy a major publisher that generate a large amount of their revenue on multiple platforms and cut off those streams of revenue.
Those AA games on switch do a lot for Square Enix and they probably wouldn’t do half as well on playstation, especially in Japan. I don’t really understand the need to buy a publisher and making their games exclusive. It doesn’t benefit me at all if xbox or nintendo only players can’t play something
Thats why bethesda acquisition is lame
I believe that if you're a platform holder and you buy a company, that's it. You own them. They're yours. The past doesn't mean anything anymore. Doesn't matter what they were or what they did. If you spent billions to acquire a company and you still release them elsewhere, why buy them? If you're buying a company, it's to strengthen and to grow your platform. Can't do that if the games you just acquired are available on your competitor's platform.
Regarding the exclusivity, it benefits me as an Xbox or PlayStation gamer. I believe that the platform holders should have console exclusives meaning that they don't go on the other hardware platforms. It's also to grow your platform and eco-system.
Last generation with PS4, all that was said, was that Sony had all of these amazing exclusives that you can't play anywhere else but what if Spider Man was on Xbox for example? If you're someone that only owns an Xbox, there's no reason to buy or get invested into PlayStation because you can play their games on your Xbox.
The need in buying a publisher and making their games 100% exclusive which im 100% all for regardless of which side does it is because it grows that respective platform and eco-system. Think about it. If you're a PlayStation only gamer but you love Bethesda or Arkane or whoever within ZeniMax and you want to play their games, if they were on PlayStation, you would have no reason to invest into the Xbox eco-system which in turn means that you're not spending any money towards Xbox and Microsoft. It's all staying with Sony and PlayStation.
That's why you have them be exclusive. Because it's the only way you'll get more consumers into your platform and eco-system because no one is going to spend hundreds of dollars on an Xbox Series X or S just to play for example, COD because it's in Game Pass when instead, you can just spend the $60 or $70 for the PlayStation 5 version of the game.
It benefits me personally as an Xbox and PlayStation gamer as I want more console exclusives. I don't want less. Only way I would be cool with little to none is if Sony and Microsoft made a joint console and you get everything but that's probably not going to happen.
If someone only owns a PlayStation OR an Xbox and wants to play Bethesda games or if Sony were to acquire Square Enix, my response would be, well, buy the other box if those games are that important to you. I tell Xbox fans on XboxEra who complain about Final Fantasy VII Remake not being on Xbox, if it's so important and you want to play it, go buy a PlayStation 5. The option is there for everyone. In my mind, there's no limitation or restriction except the ones that people impose on themselves which in that scenario, they have no right to complain.
Back to Square Enix, I personally don't see Sony acquiring them or any publisher due to the cost and they would be sacrificing the 30% cut that they would be getting from every game sale from third party publisher where as Microsoft can easily forfeit that 30% cut. Also, Sony gets most of their major titles as a full or timed console exclusive anyway so the benefit of them acquiring Square Enix would be minimal at best because they're already reaping the rewards and don't have to fund their games.