Statista Survey | PS+ leads in the USA (41%), followed by Luna (39%), and Gamepass (37%).

[IntentionalPun]

You really should google basic statistics @The Legendary Warrior

It's generally accepted that you don't EXCEED 1,000 sample size for a study, because you get huge diminishing returns on the accuracy.. like if you polled 2000 people you won't get twice as accurate of a result.. it'd be like 1% more accurate for double the amount of people having to answer.

The real problem is that this web site seems to be possible making up a study/poll that never happened lol

 

[The Legendary Warrior]

You really should google basic statistics @The Legendary Warrior

It's generally accepted that you don't EXCEED 1,000 sample size for a study, because you get huge diminishing returns on the accuracy.. like if you polled 2000 people you won't get twice as accurate of a result.. it'd be like 1% more accurate for double the amount of people having to answer.

The real problem is that this web site seems to be possible making up a study/poll that never happened lol

This is all fake news then. Fake polls with fake results typical.

 

[IntentionalPun]

This is all fake news then. Fake polls with fake results typical.

I mean I didn't hire a PI to find the study or anything.. but they don't link to it, and I am pretty good at Google and found nothing... everything just links back to this one article citing "Statista"

 

[The Legendary Warrior]

I mean I didn't hire a PI to find the study or anything.. but they don't link to it, and I am pretty good at Google and found nothing... everything just links back to this one article citing "Statista"

Yeah well it wrong, with too many flaws.

 

[Alabtrosmyster]

Just like adamsapple said, how if they poll this forum, the results would be 99:1.
The 1 percent being made up of Me, adamsapple, Bernd Lauert & a couple of other people..
Shows how terrible polling of only 1000 people is.

The problem is not the amount of people, a 1000 sample size is plenty... if the sample is made to be representative (the tools exist in professional survey software to source specific demographics in order to get a relevant sample, or a sample that allows you yo paint a specific image).

1000 is plenty.

Now, it's very possible that the sample is garbage, but this has nothing to do with sample size, 40 000 people could be picked the wrong way as well (willfully or not).

 

[The Legendary Warrior]

The problem is not the amount of people, a 1000 sample size is plenty... if the sample is made to be representative (the tools exist in professional survey software to source specific demographics in order to get a relevant sample, or a sample that allows you yo paint a specific image).

1000 is plenty.

Now, it's very possible that the sample is garbage, but this has nothing to do with sample size, 40 000 people could be picked the wrong way as well (willfully or not).

This is pointless argument, it's already proven that this fake survey is FUD.

 

[thelastword]

Just like adamsapple said, how if they poll this forum, the results would be 99:1.
The 1 percent being made up of Me, adamsapple, Bernd Lauert & a couple of other people..
Shows how terrible polling of only 1000 people is.

1000 people are fine for a sample size, you just have to ensure they are active people on the networks. I mean, you just have to ensure they don't just start a game by mistake, never play it and a certain company marks it as "said user having played that game".

 

[Shmunter]

Not much difference between the top 4

 

[The Legendary Warrior]

1000 people are fine for a sample size, you just have to ensure they are active people on the networks. I mean, you just have to ensure they don't just start a game by mistake, never play it and a certain company marks it as "said user having played that game".

Shhhh, leave the debate for people with IQ over 100 please.

 

[thelastword]

Shhhh, leave the debate for people with IQ over 100 please.

Yeah, like you. surely you are winning this debate. You have not refuted the relevance of the data, let's hear the argument why this data is irrelevant from a high IQ guy like yourself.

 

[The Legendary Warrior]

Yeah, like you. surely you are winning this debate. You have not refuted the relevance of the data, let's hear the argument why this data is irrelevant from a high IQ guy like yourself.

I already did and is not wasting anymore of my time in this thread, i have other people to set straight with facts and logic.

 

[thelastword]

I already did and is not wasting anymore of my time in this thread, i have other people to set straight with facts and logic.

Carry on, you are doing god's work in these threads. My IQ has increased just reading your informative posts alone.....Thanks.

 

[Alabtrosmyster]

This is pointless argument, it's already proven that this fake survey is FUD.

This is a different thing.

 

[Heisenberg007]

I mean I didn't hire a PI to find the study or anything.. but they don't link to it, and I am pretty good at Google and found nothing... everything just links back to this one article citing "Statista"

This is pointless argument, it's already proven that this fake survey is FUD.

I think this is the report the article referred to. https://www.statista.com/study/9541...now-ps-now-in-the-united-states-brand-report/

Really stupid of the writer to not link to the source though.

Edit: So that's the UK link. But there's also a link for Australia. https://www.statista.com/study/1034...station-now-ps-now-in-australia-brand-report/

The current US URL https://www.statista.com/study/1034...ion-now-ps-now-in-united-states-brand-report/ currently redirects to the Australian page, so there is a CMS issue. But we know that these reports are coming from Statista at least.