There are a few thousand games on PS5, only a small % of them run at 30FPS. Breaks the illusion and myth that this gen would mostly be 30fps games.
- Thread starter Gamernyc78
- Start date
of course it does.
When I had 240hz monitor few years ago, it was the first refresh rate with enough frames, to make games motion look just as good with and without motion blur.
I mean, there are so many frames at 240fps, you don't really need any motion blur. There are enough frames to create full motion in your brain.
with 30 and 60, the gaps are big enough you need to cheat accordingly.
The rule would be like with the camera. Each frame needs to capture motion since the last frame. so 30fps, each frame should not be static but contain 33ms of motion (so blur). At 240fps, the gaps are so small, it looks just like so. checked with doom 2016 !!!
Wait, you didn't see the Digital Foundry special on Stroke the Dik-Dik?
I don’t mind 30fps. But I’m now realizing I haven’t played a game in that frame rate in 4 years 
OP
OP
Yeah I hvnt noticed either because most games are above tht or have the option.I don’t mind 30fps. But I’m now realizing I haven’t played a game in that frame rate in 4 years
PS5 Pro will provide a more consistent 60fps for games that have a 60fps mode.
It literally says on the tweet "not counting PS4 ones backward compatible. "
There definitely aren't 3140 games on PS5 that aren't backwards compatible. See where the confusion arises?
He didn’t. It’s a post out of his ass.Where did he find the time to test all those?
30fps is fine, 60fps is 1000x better
But more devs need to start adding a 40fps mode...if PS5 Pro can't do 60fps on certain games, then it should have a 4k 40fps mode minimum at the least.
But more devs need to start adding a 40fps mode...if PS5 Pro can't do 60fps on certain games, then it should have a 4k 40fps mode minimum at the least.
OP
OP
The definituve number he put isn't finite and there's a little over four thst aren't hence I changed the title yesterday. Point still stands a resounding amount of games mostly have a 60fps option.
Last edited:
I used to think like this, then I got 60fps in mostly everything and then I was like "oh no 30 is trash."
But after a while I started thinking differently.
30 is only bad is directly compared to 60fps, like, if you are playing something in performance mode and then switch to 30 its horrendous.
But I started my second playthrough of Alan Wake 2 and this time I'm playing in Quality mode and its honestly not bad at all, if your eyes are ajusted its actually pretty smooth.
The biggest issue comes when FPS is unstable, if you're playing something at 60 and it drops to 50 even you'll definitivelly notice it, which is why I assume these games are locked to 30, so it has stable fps rather than something that floats between 40 and 60, making it a terrible experience. (if you want to know what I mean try playing The evil within 2 on ps4 with unlocked framerate, its jarring having some parts running at 60 then sudenly its 30 and it feels super choppy)
I play a bunch of ps4 games that arent patched to run at 60 and while I think 30fps is fine 60 will always be prefferable.
The only people pushing the narrative that this gen would be 30fps are the trashy Xbox losers like Colteastwood. Redfall and Starfield were 30fps so they tried to say it'd be the norm
@rofif is right, playing at 30fps immediately after 60fps is awful. But force yourself to play at 30fps for a few hours and you get used to it and after a while it doesn’t bother you anymore
OP
OP