Ubisoft is, shockingly worth only 2.67 Billion USD

CloudStrife

Well-known member
9 Jul 2022
343
440
If anyone, it would probably be Tencent......seeing as they already own a small part (~10%). Then you'd also have to get the Guillemots to sell.
For anyone who does buy, its would be one heck of an integration. Ubisoft has over 20k employees and several divisions. Not sure if the asking price would be worth the hassle.
 

Dabaus

Veteran
28 Jun 2022
3,071
4,695
I mean if Sony, or any company for that matter wanted, they could drop like 500 million and own 25 percent of Ubisoft. That sounds ludicrous. I don’t think Ubisoft or western publishers in general are on the up though and even that would be a bad investment.
 

Dabaus

Veteran
28 Jun 2022
3,071
4,695
Zenimax had a scandal = purchased
Activision had a scandal = Purchased
Twitter had a scandal = Purchased

See a pattern?

Ubi own Rayman, Anno, Settlers, Ass creed, Far cry, Watchdogs. A bit of polish and a revamp and they're well worth 3.5 billion. Edit and prince of persia (thanks @Shmunter)
The problem is ALL western publishers are full of rot. They’ve let these blue haired sjw lunatics in, who now run the HR and hiring department and keep hiring their friends and fellow travelers. This is the reason western gaming is dying and in a lot of cases dead. These sjw types cannot make a product people want. EA fell for it hard in the ps4/xb1 generation and outside of fifa have destroyed all of their major franchises.

Take 2 for whatever reason has been able to stay away from scandals but they fired one of the brothers that MADE gta what it is. Outside of Sonys western production western gaming is dead and Sony just created and Equity department for PlayStation so it’s only a matter of time until that catches up with them.
 

Muddasar

Veteran
22 Jun 2022
2,980
3,519
Don’t know about that. The publisher is a bloated mess.

Whoever buys them will need to seriously trim all the baggage.
 
  • they're_right_you_know
Reactions: AshHunter216

Dr Bass

The doctor is in
Founder
20 Jun 2022
2,042
3,450
I see it more like Ubisoft has a lot of potential, but it will take a company with more focus and resources to really bring that potential out.
This is the “money will solve our problems” fallacy, and it doesn’t hold true. I’ve seen this again, and again in the real world.

If Ubisoft doesn’t have the talent and ability already, their functioning is not going to be improved by an ack. It’s a nice thought but it just doesn’t work.

Ubisoft should just continue to do it’s thing and get any issues it may have sorted out internally.
 
  • they're_right_you_know
Reactions: Zzero

Hezekiah

Veteran
23 Jul 2022
1,403
1,380
MS will probably go after them, but all they've got is Far Cry and Assassin's Creed, and the former badly needs it's new engine, and who knows how that will turn out.
 

anonpuffs

Veteran
Icon Extra
29 Nov 2022
10,501
11,938
This is the “money will solve our problems” fallacy, and it doesn’t hold true. I’ve seen this again, and again in the real world.

If Ubisoft doesn’t have the talent and ability already, their functioning is not going to be improved by an ack. It’s a nice thought but it just doesn’t work.

Ubisoft should just continue to do it’s thing and get any issues it may have sorted out internally.
ubisoft have talent. what they lack is a suite of executives that understand that by trying to milk everything to death they make their games less appealing.
 

Zzero

Major Tom
9 Jan 2023
4,005
2,333
MS will probably go after them, but all they've got is Far Cry and Assassin's Creed, and the former badly needs it's new engine, and who knows how that will turn out.
Well, there's also Siege. And all the other R6 games. And the Division. And the Clancy stuff in general. And Watch Dogs. And For Honor. And Rabbids. And Rayman. And Just Dance/Let's Sing. And Prince of Persia.

But none of that matters (even though several of those are way more lucrative than Far Cry.)
 
D

Deleted member 417

Guest
This is the “money will solve our problems” fallacy, and it doesn’t hold true. I’ve seen this again, and again in the real world.

If Ubisoft doesn’t have the talent and ability already, their functioning is not going to be improved by an ack. It’s a nice thought but it just doesn’t work.

Ubisoft should just continue to do it’s thing and get any issues it may have sorted out internally.
It was a kind way of saying buy the IP's, give them to someone competent and gut the studios of bloat and waste.
 

Zzero

Major Tom
9 Jan 2023
4,005
2,333
That also lack artistic vision.

Everything they make is just an idea that already exists, with the set-dressing changed.
Just going through the list I posted above your post, there's lots of original ideas in there. Just Dance was an original idea, PoP (both 8 bit computer and PS2 era) was an original idea, Watch Dogs had original ideas, AC had original ideas, Siege had original ideas. It's just bloat like AC and Far Cry sequels coming out too often and being farmed out to the B team that leads to "the Ubisoft game" being a bad thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deleted member 417
D

Deleted member 417

Guest
But the last decade has pretty much destroyed the value of the IPS through uninspired milking.
Buy low, sell high.

Sony bought Insomniac for $250 million. After a handful of amazing games, what do you reckon their worth is now? Spiderman is nigh-on a $1 billion game.
 

anonpuffs

Veteran
Icon Extra
29 Nov 2022
10,501
11,938
That also lack artistic vision.

Everything they make is just an idea that already exists, with the set-dressing changed.
I don't think it's that they lack artistic vision, it's that they allow the artistic vision to be compromised by the demands of execs. Like they make good looking games, but the gameplay has had any fun and defining characteristics massaged out through endless focus testing and desire to cater to trendy garbage. Look at immortals fenyx rising, beautiful game... but the game design is kinda mid.
 

KiryuRealty

Cambridge Dictionary High Priest of Grammar
28 Nov 2022
6,646
8,166
Where it’s at.
I don't think it's that they lack artistic vision, it's that they allow the artistic vision to be compromised by the demands of execs. Like they make good looking games, but the gameplay has had any fun and defining characteristics massaged out through endless focus testing and desire to cater to trendy garbage. Look at immortals fenyx rising, beautiful game... but the game design is kinda mid.
Even Immortals was just a copy and paste of Breath of the Wild, though!