[claim] Skull and Bones cost Ubisoft 850 million
- Thread starter Airbus
- Start date
I don't have a reason to not like this. I didn't even care about this game nor support it. We are on a forum, critical thinking is the basic requirement here and it's clear you lack that.Im just taking headline from other gaming sites and you dont have proof to call it grifter
Skull And Bones Reportedly Cost $650-850 Million To Develop
According to a new report, Skull and Bones cost Ubisoft anywhere from $650-850 Million and has led to the company's downfall.tech4gamers.com
The only argument you have right now is = i dont like it, so im gona call it grifter
OP
OP
Dualshocker and techgamer said it cost 650-850 million
But hold on two iconera user yurinka and danja said those numbers are wrong so it must be true and im gona take iconera member opinion cos theyre my friend
Sory im quoting the wrong person was meant for danja
Last edited:
Maybe it cost 850 million SGD but then again $850 is too much to be spent on this turd. Singapore should sue ubisoft for damages for defamation as this game is associated with their country , I hope they stop giving subsidies to them after this humiliation
OP
OP
Dualshocker and techgamer report was wrong because Danja said it so it must be true
If Danja said the earth is flat than i believe in you too lord danja we will never doubted you
We using a source from the place that made a kid drop a grenade down a toilet.
Corporations don't waste time debunking every single nonsensical post that random people post about them. There's countless wrong stuff posted about them on internet, can't go one by one debunking anything.
If some big investor asks them about the budget, revenue, sales or profitability of a specific project, they may reply with the specifics or not. Other than that, they only reveal what they they are forced to do so as public company, in addition to a few additional numbers that make them look good, like good sales or revenue of a specific game or IP that sold particularly well in whatever period they are reporting about.
I can't think of a single media source more biased towards Playstation than Colin Moriarty. Try again.
It was a big AAA project from the start and a long development. But gaming media has become bs this year. It would make sense, there was rumours about it since Black Flag and being a AAAA game etc.
Not biting it because so many rumours go as official. 600million is more realistic if that, but 850? I dunno
Not biting it because so many rumours go as official. 600million is more realistic if that, but 850? I dunno
Last edited:
What does his bias have to do with anything? He got fed shit from a source he trusted... Try to correlate next time, something Colin also failed to do with the Concord budget lol.
As my post wasn't even about Colin
I don't think he's right but they made the game three times, practically and had major tax breaks from the local government. A LOT of money was blown on that turd.
We are talking about the Concord budget and he is almost certainly right on it. He hasn't commented on SoT at all.