Easily.Add Days Gone for me to thst list. I'd rate that 90 plus so fuck meta
Final Fantasy XVI | Review Thread
- Thread starter John Elden Ring
- Start date
Unfortunately Sony pays attention to it. So until they demand every score be weighted equally things won't change.
Game informer review burns my eyes. Guy thinks it's a 10/10 but purposely gives it an 8.5 because of bullshit like representation. FUCK i hate this industry
I didn’t know that screen rant reviewed games.
This isn't accurate at all. He has plenty of comments about the game, including the gameplay, story, and pacing. I'd say those three things are pretty major.
Also, the "unweighted" average looks like it's an 89 currently. Again, at the numbers these reviews hit at, it's pretty hard for any one review to materially affect the score.
what does "biggest miss" mean?
He said the pacing of the sidequests sucked. Optional sidequests. What the fuck are we talking about here? They are looking for every minor bullshit excuse to ding points off of a game, Zelda is nowhere near perfect but every reviewer looked past the multitudes of flaws (let's talk about pacing in THAT game) and gave it 10s anyway. What is this bullshit narrative? Dude lies his ass off, says there's flaws to the RPG side of things, but it's literally an action game, not a traditional RPG, and that wasnt even his main complaint in the review!
Last edited:
Reviewers need to understand they are not reviewing these games for their own personal catalog. It is to inform the consumer. If the game is a 10.... Then give it a 10..
They need to understand a 10 doesn't mean it's a perfect game. It can have flaws and still be a 10/10 experience. Like they did with Elden Ring and Zelda... Both with their own flaws
This game was never sold as an RPG. It's an action game with RPG elements. I see this critique in quite a few reviews. I also still don't comprehend why they continue to give games to people to review that hate the genre..
Many games get a free pass and 10/10 across the board even if they have some flaws or performance issues. Not FF16. It's like they went out of their way to find anything to complain about.
88 is a good score but it feels low when all the comments are so positive.
That's a very 21st century Eastern Seaboard view of slavery. Europeans were enslaved by the Ottomans and each other for centuries.
Did Zelda have POCs and did those POCs accurately represent the trauma faced by their respective races? If not, I'm afraid I'm gonna have to dock 6 points.
I think we should split off a separate thread so we can discuss spoilers without other people who read the thread for reviews have to dodge landmines. Playing the game now btw, I can see why some people say the early sidequests aren't great. Whatever though
Those small delivery sidequests are like a tutorial. People complain about anything.
Yea metacritic was a mistake. Look at that. LMAO pokemon a 10. Quests re insulting?? Shit reeks of bias.
You still need to use spoiler tags in spoiler thread, because we at the different time in story.
Just write your progress first, that people could see, before reading it further.
Last edited:
This game has rejuvenated my love for gaming 
God bless yoshi-p. The man puts all you fraud ass devs to shame
God bless yoshi-p. The man puts all you fraud ass devs to shame
Stevivor
Very well done SquareEnix, love to see it
Very well done SquareEnix, love to see it
Stevivor
Very well done SquareEnix, love to see it
That guy is a weirdo. He flaunts his extreme love for Xbox and Phil Spencer...and then whines that people call him biased
Only way to get real unbiased reviews is from youtubers who weren't sponsored