Well, let's see - over the course of Phil's tenure:
That all said, I find it pretty likely Phil will stick around in the mid-term. Just from the perspective of their company-wide culture, MS seems reluctant to meaningfully deal with leaders of underperforming divions and initiatives, instead content to keep them in power year-on-year and wait until enough pressure mounts their hand becomes forced. They continue to strike me as a company unwilling to consistently put - and keep in power - strong leaders with uncompromising, long-term visions, and instead appear overly reactive to current market trends yet late to the game.
Oh, and thanks for the quick approval. It's a pleasure to have a platform that actually welcomes these kind of actual discussions.
- Xbox HW sales have fallen behind the disastrous Xbox One generation
- Global, non-US marketshare, brand relevance, and SW splits continue to decline
- Prioritizing 12 TF has increased build complexity, exacerbating Series X supply issues and created a wider, slower chip that's harder to maximize than PS5's narrow, fast design
- Series S has utterly failed at its stated goals, increased development complexity, and consumes silicon that otherwise could have been dedicated to Series X
- Through Game Pass, has conditioned their customer base to prioritize subscription content over traditional purchasing, sacrificed gobs of first party revenue, and diminished the attractiveness of the platform for third parties
- Failed to address systemic rot at the studio helming the very IP on which the entire Xbox brand was built, only to keep incompetent, chronic hacks like Frank O' Connor, Kiki Wolfkill, and Bonnie Ross at the top, leading to a disastrous release, permanent damage to the Halo IP, and gutting of 343i
- Maintained an extremely dysfunctional first party pipeline that continues to be marked with extended development cycles and high profile departures
- Failed to establish the Windows store on PC
- Wasted untold time, PR, and resources on a failed acquisition
That all said, I find it pretty likely Phil will stick around in the mid-term. Just from the perspective of their company-wide culture, MS seems reluctant to meaningfully deal with leaders of underperforming divions and initiatives, instead content to keep them in power year-on-year and wait until enough pressure mounts their hand becomes forced. They continue to strike me as a company unwilling to consistently put - and keep in power - strong leaders with uncompromising, long-term visions, and instead appear overly reactive to current market trends yet late to the game.
Oh, and thanks for the quick approval. It's a pleasure to have a platform that actually welcomes these kind of actual discussions.