Probably depends on who you ask.Is Starfall expected to be bigger than FFXVI? I'm not feeling it.
Probably depends on who you ask.Is Starfall expected to be bigger than FFXVI? I'm not feeling it.
It won’t be successful without the biggest console user base.Starfield will be successful.
And not because of any grand conspiracy to save Xbox or anything. It'll be successful for the same reason all Bethesda-developed RPGs are successful: they're excellent at providing the illusion of depth while actually being quite shallow. They have the incredible presentation and just enough mechanics and side content to trick more casual players into thinking they're playing something super deep. And in spite of a fuck ton of bugs, like always.
You nailed the quality aspect of it. Sales wise it was always going to be successful solely because of PC.Starfield will be successful.
And not because of any grand conspiracy to save Xbox or anything. It'll be successful for the same reason all Bethesda-developed RPGs are successful: they're excellent at providing the illusion of depth while actually being quite shallow. They have the incredible presentation and just enough mechanics and side content to trick more casual players into thinking they're playing something super deep. And in spite of a fuck ton of bugs, like always.
FF15 sold >10 mil copies even though it sucked. You're wrong.WTF... comparing final fantasy vs a BGS release? Are we in 1997?
Only Rockstar and some top tier first party releases are bigger events in gaming.
Sorry to be a party popper but FFXVI will turn out exactly like every single game since X; Good game for it's audience (at best) decent sales for a AAA title but nothing more.
They should learn from Capcom and focus on remakes. FF is like Frank Zappa's phrase about jazz: It ain't dead but it smells funny.
And Redfall basically launched unfinished.It concerns me that Phil Spencer said Redfall was further along in development than Starfield at the time of the acquisition. I assumed Starfield was in full development for like 5+ years.
simple, that entire "honest phil" interview was bullshit and he lied. There is no way that redfall was further along in development than starfield considering starfield started its development process after fallout 4 (2015). Phil lies a whole lot and he's very good at making it sound believable, that's how he got to where he is and how he still has a cult of bozos who hang on his every word, despite barely any of them ever proving out.It concerns me that Phil Spencer said Redfall was further along in development than Starfield at the time of the acquisition. I assumed Starfield was in full development for like 5+ years.
What are we? In 2010 for this kind of BS to be spewed? LmaoWTF... comparing final fantasy vs a BGS release? Are we in 1997?
Only Rockstar and some top tier first party releases are bigger events in gaming.
Sorry to be a party popper but FFXVI will turn out exactly like every single game since X; Good game for it's audience (at best) decent sales for a AAA title but nothing more.
They should learn from Capcom and focus on remakes. FF is like Frank Zappa's phrase about jazz: It ain't dead but it smells funny.
My money is on Final Fantasy XVI. Is Elder Scroll online bigger than Final Fantasy XIV?WTF... comparing final fantasy vs a BGS release? Are we in 1997?
Only Rockstar and some top tier first party releases are bigger events in gaming.
Sorry to be a party popper but FFXVI will turn out exactly like every single game since X; Good game for it's audience (at best) decent sales for a AAA title but nothing more.
They should learn from Capcom and focus on remakes. FF is like Frank Zappa's phrase about jazz: It ain't dead but it smells funny.
Let's say their studios were releasing enough really good games one after the other and everyone was happy we would not care much about when they were bought.It still annoys me that this is even being treated this way. This is NOT a Microsoft game. They simply opened their wallets and massively overspent to shrink the reach of this game to the least popular platform on the planet.
The idea that it could "redeem" the Xbox is just ridiculous to me. The only thing that can do that is for MS to actually have some truly home grown hits.
The only purpose of SF is to gain more subscribers on Gamepass. If successful, that’s how they recoup the expense.Starfield should launch bigger than FF16. It also should launch bigger than its closest competitor; Cyberpunk 2077 — which still did like 20 million plus.
The thing is… gamepass for console and pc has completely butchered metrics and selling the game for a fraction of the cost.
So while I do believe player metrics will be great because people still play Skyrim and Fallout 4 today more than most new releases…. Hell, go look at the XBL charts. Skyrim is placed better than Redfall. LOLs. I can’t see them recouping dev costs and marketing. That’s a problem.
Are people hyped for it, though? MS suck at marketing… people don’t even know it exists.The only purpose of SF is to gain more subscribers on Gamepass. If successful, that’s how they recoup the expense.