They proceeded to make it reality.View attachment 1725
Basically nothing is / was safe and they didn't consider or worry about regulators or monopolization. In fact, it seems a monopoly is the goal based on the size and scope of this list.
What are your thoughts on this revelation?
Well yeah no . It doesn’t always happen because of regulators or a company can just decline and laugh in MS’s face like Nintendo did. But I think this is proof, that MS would buy every single developer and publisher in the industry if they could.Consideration doesn't means it will happen ofcourse Sony considers a lot of things but only few are bought upon reality
That's just not possible we are now arguing superficially heck even if the regulators didn't existed it would not happen Sony does similar thingsWell yeah no . It doesn’t always happen because of regulators or a company can just decline and laugh in MS’s face like Nintendo did. But I think this is proof, that MS would buy every single developer and publisher in the industry if they could.
it wasn't consideration, it was targets. they actually proceeded to do it. how many they bought already? how many they tried but were declined and what they are trying now?Consideration doesn't means it will happen ofcourse Sony considers a lot of things but only few are bought upon reality
They tried to do it last gen bad luck they could not it is okay to snuff out your competition only legally having more money doesnt count as anticompetitiveDisgusting. Xbox needs to die, they don't contribute with anything positive in the gaming space.
Except it actually does if you try to buy up the market to directly hurt competition like MS is trying to do. Now we even have them saying it on their own words.They tried to do it last gen bad luck they could not it is okay to snuff out your competition only legally having more money doesnt count as anticompetitive
The games won't be exclusive barring the new IPs and we have seen Jimmy telling something else under oath and privately something elseExcept it actually does if you try to buy up the market to directly hurt competition like MS is trying to do. Now we even have them saying it on their own words.
Are you at least getting paid to do this? Seems like you wandered in the wrong board if you think anyone is going to fall for your BS.The games won't be exclusive barring the new IPs and we have seen Jimmy telling something else under oath and privately something else
We are going to be in a new world order whenever the ABK acquisition pulls through just stating an assumption which may happenAre you at least getting paid to do this? Seems like you wondered in the wrong board if you think anyone is going to fall for your BS.
facts? so you are from future.. come on, man.We are going to be in a new world order whenever the ABK acquisition pulls through just stating facts
“Barring the new IP’s” Is that why Hellblade 2 and The Outer Worlds are going to be exclusive?The games won't be exclusive barring the new IPs and we have seen Jimmy telling something else under oath and privately something else
Sony only has a problem with ABK I don't know why even go there "False equivalencies"“Barring the new IP’s” Is that why Hellblade 2 and The Outer Worlds are going to be exclusive?
They tried to do it last gen bad luck they could not it is okay to snuff out your competition only legally having more money doesnt count as anticompetitive
Sony only has a problem with ABK I don't know why even go there "False equivalencies"
They tried " they "meant for SonyThey tried? They stopped trying in 2009 / 2010. And yes, using your "money" to acquire sizeable chunks of the market counts as anticompetitive behaviour.
Honest question, are you 18 or younger? Because every single comment of yours shows someone that's naive to business reality and that has actually never even worked a day in their life.
They tried " they "meant for Sony