its not flawed logic. It makes perfect sense. It should be assumed to be exclusive until proven otherwise. Their is not direct evidence its not exclusive.The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Your logic in bullet points:
The problem with this (flawed) logic is that it can be easily refuted:
- Elder Scrolls 6 is an exclusive
- Arkane is owned by Xbox
- Therefore blade is an exclusive
- The Last of Us is an exclusive
- San Diego Studio is owned by Sony
- Therefore MLB is an exclusive
None of what you said refutes what I said. In the grand scheme of things, Blade is irrelevant, and being tied to a dying brand like Xbox will only make it more irrelevant. Additionally, being commercially successful means fuck all: There are plenty of movies with tiny budgets that were commercially successful but made very little cash.
Blade is not irrelevant. Marvel is literally rebooting the franchise. If it was irrelevant like you claim, that would of not happened. They're also making a brand new game for Blade. Again, the movies were all successful and gained a cult like following. Blade not being a household doesn't mean irrelevant. You're wrong on both accounts.