Yeah, someone else in that thread corrected them and mentioned that those were old.Really? It was posted like it was new on trashera.
Yeah, someone else in that thread corrected them and mentioned that those were old.Really? It was posted like it was new on trashera.
I read your username asshunter the first time now i'm sad it isn't.Yeah, someone else in that thread corrected them and mentioned that those were old.
What if I told you it was meant to be read that way.I read your username asshunter the first time now i'm sad it isn't.
Different scores for different platforms is justified when there are performance differences, but most publishers will only send the best-performing version to reviewers, hence shit like Skyrim getting 9s and 10s on PS3 when it was so broken that a lot of people couldn't even play it before the first patch.Cyberpunk 2077, or TLOUP is an isolated case, it happens once in 10,000 times.
99% of multiplatform games are identical on PC, Play and Xbox. Take Call of Duty, Battlefield or GTA for example : they're the same game.
So there's no point in having different scores, except to fuel the console wars.
You would have told me that the Switch has different versions than the others, that's truer.
back up to 91 with 130 reviewsHolding a 90 with 129 reviews is still extremely impressive.... Spider-Man had 119 reviews in the first 6 hours, Mario Wonder is still at only 80 reviews over 24 hours later.
Reviewers are selective asf about perf and big issues hence Souls ganes never getting docked for them, as you mebtioned Bethesda games and others but then thyll go berserk and dick points to games such as Days Gone and Driveclub. It's disgusting and sad.Different scores for different platforms is justified when there are performance differences, but most publishers will only send the best-performing version to reviewers, hence shit like Skyrim getting 9s and 10s on PS3 when it was so broken that a lot of people couldn't even play it before the first patch.
Insomniac right now:back up to 91 with 130 reviews
IGN Portugal gave it a 100
I told you the FAQ was old and you didn’t believe and keep posting.
Now you created suck a shameless excuse to your own ignorance
Next time just accept somebody know what he was talking about.
If you reviewed the game on a low\mid range PC or on the xbox series S... yes there are good reasons why it may feel different, or look kind of blurry and drop more frames here and there at the very least.So there's no point in having different scores, except to fuel the console wars.
it's still the same game except for a few pixels.If you reviewed the game on a low\mid range PC or on the xbox series S... yes there are good reasons why it may feel different, or look kind of blurry and drop more frames here and there at the very least.
Same last gen, many games were less enjoyable on the xbone vs the PS4, like every generation before, there are better versions of each games.
If a PC version comes with problems with come configurations (performance, frame pacing, etc.) or DRM breaks it, well it makes the game less enjoyable too.
Same game, FAR from the same experience, and reviews are supposed to speak to the experience, not ignore it to simply review the content.
it's still the same game except for a few pixels.
It's a far cry from a case like Crysis PC vs Crysis PS3/360 or the Switch versions vs the others, where the difference is quite obvious.
Overall the PS, Xbox and PC versions are almost all the same.