Marvel Spider Man 2 | Review Thread

What Scores do you think Spider Man 2 will get?

  • 45-55%

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 50-55%

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 55-60%

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 60-65%

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 70-75%

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 75-80%

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 80-85%

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 85-90%

    Votes: 17 53.1%
  • 90-96%

    Votes: 13 40.6%
  • 96-100%

    Votes: 2 6.3%

  • Total voters
    32
  • Poll closed .

solidsnake_1

Member
17 Oct 2023
61
169
Oh yes it can. Ragnorok finished with like 149 reviews total, Spider-Man will likely get up onto that range and it is already on the verge of dropping to 89 with only one more game behind it

c9cb8c6bf05ff61ed79f6dc18296162b.png


does meta site use random order for the ranking ?

mine is different order
 

Cool hand luke

Veteran
14 Feb 2023
2,958
5,261
Can anyone explain to me why or how this is possible?

Before 83% Review added
Screenshot-20231017-120056-2.png


After 83% Review added
Screenshot-20231018-180412-Chrome.jpg
Should only be possible if Indiewire is heavily weighted. There is no other scenario in which a few 90s and an 83 drags you from 91.01 (example based on ranking in the first screenshot) to 90.02 with nearly 130 reviews. It's basically the equivalent of Indiewire being worth 20x your average reviewer.
 

On Demand

Veteran
Icon Extra
30 Jul 2022
1,858
3,016
Still 91 on Opencritic

 

On Demand

Veteran
Icon Extra
30 Jul 2022
1,858
3,016
The official thread on trashera is so barebones. Not really surprised coming from that site.

So much more effort could of been into the thread.
 

Darth Vader

I find your lack of faith disturbing
Founder
20 Jun 2022
7,365
10,933
Why are people so caught up on the game being 91 or 90 and above? Just enjoy the game. It would be cool because they already deserve that 90+ game, but whatever.
 

Gods&Monsters

Banned
21 Jun 2022
5,607
11,467
Can anyone explain to me why or how this is possible?

Before 83% Review added
Screenshot-20231017-120056-2.png


After 83% Review added
Screenshot-20231018-180412-Chrome.jpg
I don't even see the 83 on the Indiewire review. It's like they took a random number. Somebody needs to tell Metacritic.

Wasn't that the fake playstation fan that Alannah Pearce did an entire YouTube video on when they're actually an Xbox fanboy 🤣
Yes it was. He's always hating on every PS game. She's so stupid.
 

historia

Veteran
29 Jun 2023
2,818
2,721
Anybody here don't grasp the concept of mean/aggerate?

90.51 or 90.52 rounded to 91, 83 will lower it to 90.4x


It takes them 6-7 0.25 -basic reviews with lower the score by one, can't see that happen

I reckon Edge would give it 8.5/8, so the mean should be 89.9x, since Edge is at 0.75-basic.

Should land on 90.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Gods&Monsters

Cool hand luke

Veteran
14 Feb 2023
2,958
5,261
Anybody here don't grasp the concept of mean/aggerate?

90.51 or 90.52 rounded to 91, 83 will lower it to 90.4x


It takes them 6-7 0.25 -basic reviews with lower the score by one, can't see that happen

I reckon Edge would give it 8.5/8, so the mean should be 89.9x, since Edge is at 0.75-basic.

Should land on 90.
Rounding doesn't explain it going from the bottom of the 91s in the metacritic all time list to the bottom of the 90s. Dropped some 130 places after 1 review which was .8 below the average.
 

historia

Veteran
29 Jun 2023
2,818
2,721
Rounding doesn't explain it going from the bottom of the 91s in the metacritic all time list to the bottom of the 90s. Dropped some 130 places after 1 review which was .8 below the average.
That is broken.

Uhm I remembered seeing GOW Ragnarok at 94 and was put lower than TLOU2 at 93
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Cool hand luke

Puff

Veteran
10 Jan 2023
1,503
3,671
Screenshot-20231018-200842-Chrome.jpg




He is right! They don’t give it a score in the article. It must be a mistake
 

Gods&Monsters

Banned
21 Jun 2022
5,607
11,467
Screenshot-20231018-200842-Chrome.jpg




He is right! They don’t give it a score in the article. It must be a mistake
I said the same thing earlier there is no score on the review, not even B+ or A. Meta chose a random number.
Somebody tell Indiewire then.
It's more Metacritic that needs to be contacted. No idea where they took that 83.