does meta site use random order for the ranking ?Oh yes it can. Ragnorok finished with like 149 reviews total, Spider-Man will likely get up onto that range and it is already on the verge of dropping to 89 with only one more game behind it
Best Games This Year - Metacritic
Metacritic aggregates music, game, tv, and movie reviews from the leading critics. Only Metacritic.com uses METASCORES, which let you know at a glance how each item was reviewed.www.metacritic.com
That shit dropped 100 points off 1 review. Meta needs better system.Can anyone explain to me why or how this is possible?
Before 83% Review added
After 83% Review added
So I took a look at your twitter profile. Yep, that explains it lol.
Get the fuck out of here
Should only be possible if Indiewire is heavily weighted. There is no other scenario in which a few 90s and an 83 drags you from 91.01 (example based on ranking in the first screenshot) to 90.02 with nearly 130 reviews. It's basically the equivalent of Indiewire being worth 20x your average reviewer.Can anyone explain to me why or how this is possible?
Before 83% Review added
After 83% Review added
Wasn't that the fake playstation fan that Alannah Pearce did an entire YouTube video on when they're actually an Xbox fanboyI didn't even realize he was on here, lol. I remember seeing stupid shit on twitter from him and seeing him get made fun of in various news articles.
I don't even see the 83 on the Indiewire review. It's like they took a random number. Somebody needs to tell Metacritic.Can anyone explain to me why or how this is possible?
Before 83% Review added
After 83% Review added
Yes it was. He's always hating on every PS game. She's so stupid.Wasn't that the fake playstation fan that Alannah Pearce did an entire YouTube video on when they're actually an Xbox fanboy
Rounding doesn't explain it going from the bottom of the 91s in the metacritic all time list to the bottom of the 90s. Dropped some 130 places after 1 review which was .8 below the average.Anybody here don't grasp the concept of mean/aggerate?
90.51 or 90.52 rounded to 91, 83 will lower it to 90.4x
It takes them 6-7 0.25 -basic reviews with lower the score by one, can't see that happen
I reckon Edge would give it 8.5/8, so the mean should be 89.9x, since Edge is at 0.75-basic.
Should land on 90.
That is broken.Rounding doesn't explain it going from the bottom of the 91s in the metacritic all time list to the bottom of the 90s. Dropped some 130 places after 1 review which was .8 below the average.
I said the same thing earlier there is no score on the review, not even B+ or A. Meta chose a random number.
IndieWire Reviews
Metacritic aggregates music, game, tv, and movie reviews from the leading critics. Only Metacritic.com uses METASCORES, which let you know at a glance how each item was reviewed.www.metacritic.com
‘Spider-Man 2’ Review: Sony’s Brilliant Video Game Sequel Understands Spidey Better Than the MCU Ever Has
It takes some chutzpah to reuse a title like "Spider-Man 2," but this wildly fun PS5 game is worthy of being compared to Sam Raimi's classic.www.indiewire.com
‘Spider-Man: Miles Morales’ Review: PlayStation Offers the Perfect Antidote to a Year Without Marvel Movies
Miles Morales swings onto the PlayStation 5 in a short but sweet marvel of a game that feels like playing 'Into the Spider-Verse.'www.indiewire.com
He is right! They don’t give it a score in the article. It must be a mistake
It's more Metacritic that needs to be contacted. No idea where they took that 83.Somebody tell Indiewire then.