I didn't say it looked a generation ahead, I always said it looked better than PC maxed out. And it does, regardless of what tech is being showcased. It looks substantially improved.
And it still looks better.
It doesn't need to be.
Marvel's Spider-Man Remastered - PC Features Revealed
- Thread starter John Elden Ring
- Start date
- Status
I didn't say it looked a generation ahead, I always said it looked better than PC maxed out. And it does, regardless of what tech is being showcased. It looks substantially improved.
And it still looks better.
It doesn't need to be.
(Founder)
Why should I include 2000 cards if the guy talked about 3000?
D
Deleted member 13
Guest
When HFW comes to PC, I'll do an analysis on it.
"Looks better" isn't going to be a means of arguing it. We have to look at what exactly looks better and why.
It'll look better on PC maxed out when compared to the PS5 version, for sure.
D
Deleted member 13
Guest
No. I'm saying I'll do an analysis of HFW compared with HZD on PC. Same platform same settings.
Ah. my point still stands, it will look better.
D
Deleted member 13
Guest
The trailer is very good, and the game looks great after all these years. I think it will sell very well, in the same way it did sell very well on PS.
I think the 32:9 feature is very cool, something that in PC someone could use it -if has a powerful enough PC to move it at a decent framerate- because many people has two 16:9 monitors.
I think the 32:9 feature is very cool, something that in PC someone could use it -if has a powerful enough PC to move it at a decent framerate- because many people has two 16:9 monitors.
That is given… HFW on PC will looks better than HZD on PC… there is zero doubt about that.
The point is HFW on PS5 looks better than HZD on PC and I agree with him.
HFW on PC will look better than HFW on PS5 that is another given.
Last edited:
PC is getting a good game if you like Spider-Man. It was also fun on PS4 when it released, and the PS5 updates were nice. It will still look better on a superior PC. Everyone gets to enjoy the game.
The end.
The end.
D
Deleted member 13
Guest
I can agree to that. But I want to know by how much. It's just my personal thing.
That's in extremely, extremely rare instances where the code on PC could be more tightly optimized. It's not performing like a 2070 Super or a 2080, it's performing like an overclocked 2060 under very optimized conditions.
I know you are talking raytracing but in games that don't use it (like destiny 2) even a laptop gtx 1660m shits all over the consoles.
Because it is a PS4 game...
What the next-gen patch does is to up the framerate to 60 and 120fps.
You are basically doubling the framerate of PS4 Pro verion running on PS5.
See that's not really fair, these consoles are basically in line with a 1080 TI in terms of raster performance.
D
Deleted member 51
Guest
One of the best posts in here. Who cares if you get to play it at, 30, 40, 60, 144hz? 16:9 or 32:9? Who cares if it came out 4 years ago, 2 years ago, or next summer? We all get to play and discuss the SAME game, right? I don't care if someone played it 2 years before me, and I'm sure they don't care if I get to play it in the highest settings.... Right?
Wish people understood that playing a game earlier vs best visual show case, doesn't take away from the game, at all. Some love the bragging points of getting the game a few years earlier, some love to brag about best quality, framerates, features. It's the same game guys, just different experience
- Status