Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater Remake Isn't a PlayStation Exclusive

[Lord Mittens]

Let's be realistic.

The only actual Remake/Remaster people wants is MGS4.
The others already had several versions in several platforms.

MGS4 is the only that you can only play if you have a PS3.

It is the only game in the franchise that I should call a MEGATON if it is released this generation.

Yeah I'm good, I don't want a remake of a game that has more cutscenes than actual gameplay.

 

[Yobo]

I just hope this remake has an option to streamline the survival elements. I never could fully get into the game thanks to that and the alert meter that took eons to clear once you were spotted.

MGS2 modded on PC though... chefs kiss.

Some of it they can and should

Adding camo and injury management to an overlay menu would reduce clunkiness a lot

 

[Yobo]

Release order still precedes chronological order and MGS is the more important game and could use a wide available remake.

MGS3 is the better game though

 

[ksdixon]

For the amount of YEARS this has been rumored, walked-back, reignited etc, I think it's fucking stupid if it's real, Sony helped develop or finance, and it's also multiplaform.

 

[Kokoloko]

Don't get why Sony made SH exclusive but not MGS

I totally agree.
Blooper making SH2 remake or MGS Remake with someone else…. I know what Id choose.

Just because they are in charge doesnt mean they make smart choices all the time Unfortunately

 

[Kokoloko]

MGS3 is the better game though

To some fans. I prefer MGS1. But love MGS3 too

 

[Vertigo]

Whether or not second party is a real term is whatever. It was most actively used to define rare’s relationship with Nintendo. Not much fits that today except maybe the Pokémon company? I dunno much about Nintendo’s modern infrastructure… It’s kinda hard to argue rare was a third party when a huge chunk of the company was owned by Nintendo before Microsoft bought them entirely.

I’d love to find better sources but I’m not so here’s the wiki info:

“Nintendo bought a 25% stake in the company that gradually increased to 49%, making Rare a second-party developer for Nintendo.”

 

[Swift_Star]

Whether or not second party is a real term is whatever. It was most actively used to define rare’s relationship with Nintendo. Not much fits that today except maybe the Pokémon company? I dunno much about Nintendo’s modern infrastructure… It’s kinda hard to argue rare was a third party when a huge chunk of the company was owned by Nintendo before Microsoft bought them entirely.

I’d love to find better sources but I’m not so here’s the wiki info:

“Nintendo bought a 25% stake in the company that gradually increased to 49%, making Rare a second-party developer for Nintendo.”

A second party to me is like the first Demon's Souls and Bloodborne. When a publisher pays a developer to make a game, but said developer is not owned by the publisher.

 

[John Elden Ring]

 

[Kereke12]

For the amount of YEARS this has been rumored, walked-back, reignited etc, I think it's fucking stupid if it's real, Sony helped develop or finance, and it's also multiplaform.

Do you want another debacle of Street Fighter V

 

[Yobo]

Honestly these guys looking at YouTube back ends to spoil showcases days before they happen are the worst

 

[Yobo]

Do you want another debacle of Street Fighter V

"Debacle", just the best selling Street Fighter ever

 

[Bryank75]

Some were also saying MGS3 might not be the only Metal Gear stuff at the showcase...

Insane that they couldn't at least get timed exclusivity but I guess they'll sell so little on Xbox and PC, it won't matter much.

 

[Lord Mittens]

Some were also saying MGS3 might not be the only Metal Gear stuff at the showcase...

Insane that they couldn't at least get timed exclusivity but I guess they'll sell so little on Xbox and PC, it won't matter much.

 

[ksdixon]

Do you want another debacle of Street Fighter V

Debacle? AFAIK Sony helped develop/co-founded SFV and this would-be MGS Remake. If Sony did, it shouldnt then be a multiplaform release/IP.

 

[Swift_Star]

Do you want another debacle of Street Fighter V

What debacle? The game is highly successful.

 

[Kereke12]

What debacle? The game is highly successful.

You guys get on the defensive that quickly lol I’m talking about the complaints it got from Xbox players. Jesus lol

 

[AshHunter216]

The only debacle I was aware of with SFV is Xbox fanboys being angry that it wasn't on Xbox.

 

[Nym]

SFV was grumbled about for years because of it's insanely poor launch mainly, but the grumbling continued for years because of the the specifics of the fighting engine and the game being perceived as an oversimplification from previous entries. Only in the past couple of years has the majority opinion on the game turned around as Capcom has done quite a lot to improve what was there.