That dude talked so much trash during this ordeal and had so many people on his show to dunk on Playstation with, I have no sympathy for a supposed professional.
What's worse for them is that so many of those own Xbox One and Series S consoles. Most of those consoles will be retired pretty quickly and I doubt they'll be replaced by Series X consoles.Gamepass fucked them in this regard. They have 50 million xbox owners, but they can't sell games to them as they promised everything on Gamepass day one. Hence, it's impossible to win 3rd party exclusivity deal unless developer/ publisher is desperate.
Thought this Hog guy had some decent perspective, but seeing this paints a different picture….
Best acquisition
Seems that Stadia closure was to blame
Sony runs the world.
Killerrin from resetera made a great point here:
"Realistically Microsoft is out beteeen a rock and a hard place here. With these reasonings being given by the CMA theyll find it hard to buy anything in the future. Gaming or not, if Azure or Windows gets involved in any way it'll be blocked.
So this poses a problem for Microsoft. They expand their business mainly through aquisitions, so if they can't buy a company in a market where they are the last place competitor, because of issues in Cloud on a Beta Product that is a nascent market with barely any market power behind it, with Azure and Windows being the reason for the block, then they won't be able to buy anything.
So with that in mind, Microsoft may be in a situation where they are forced to fight. Just to prevent this precedent from being set."
Isnt this what xbox fantatics wanted to happen to sony because of the arbitrary "high end market" definition? Now Microsfts REAL monoply may be used agaianst them. I persoanlly dont think that precedent holds but man what a turn.
Seems that Stadia closure was to blame
Forget about himDo we know anything about xbox cheerleaders like destin? I wonder if they’re ok …
He's ugly. No cream will help.There's an expression in Portugal that says "põe Nivea que isso passa". It basically means that you should apply some Nivea creme. You fill in the blanks.
Secret Agent Phil killed two birds with one bald stone.
But again, it's a separate unrelated business that only have in common that they use servers.Owning a CLOUD service provider is inconsequential for CLOUD gaming? Your attempts of Reductio ad absurdum fail straight away. Costs have no bearing in the business size, and Intelligent Cloud has a profitability of about 10B per quarter. PER QUARTER. That's about the same profit as Sony has PER YEAR.
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/Investor/earnings/FY-2023-Q3/document/viewdocument/SlidesFY23Q3.pptx
Additionally, while XCloud uses different server racks, the business scope is the same. Like, you're trying to find excuses for something that's so in your face a blind man could see.
We have absolutely no data showing that Xcloud has more worldwide users than PS cloud gaming, we only know that PS Plus has twice the subs than GP and that worldwide Sony gaming subs generate way more money than MS gaming subs.XCloud is the biggest console Cloud service provider. Playstation Plus is not the same kind of service, and you, as someone that things they're so smart, should know this. Also, the UK not being the world has no relevance as a counter for my argument. Stop throwing shit in the hopes it sticks.
Cloud gaming started 20 years ago and its first 'important'/'relevant' player Gaikai for the modern cloud gaming -who filled some of the patents being used today, now owned by Sony- started in the late 2000s.Irrelevant. Cloud marketing is a nascent market, with low barrier of entry. Allowing consolidation this early on will lead (if the market segment is successful) to less competition going forward. This shit is economics 101. Go back to school.
I suggest you to at least go to wikipedia to know what these terms means, because I see you don't know it.Another Reductio ad absurdum and Strawman? Fantastic. You should not only try and learn basic economic theory, but also philosophy.
Yes, they are almost as irrelevant as the Azure market position when talking about gaming or cloud gaming.Tesla has almost 4% of the car market share. Florida is the biggest banana exporter in the US. Both of those are facts. They are also fucking irrelevant to this discussion.
Yep, you can read a preview on Google Books: "Halo: The Official Cookbook - Recipes from across the galaxy". One of the most interesting Xbox releases combined with the Xbox nail polish, the Xbox Series X fridge, and Xbox Series S toaster. It would be interesting to sell them together in a bundle.Did they? I wasn't aware, but seems to me that you are. Good for you. Ah, sorry, here's a funny gif that describes what you are
Let it go man. It's over. Sheesh.But again, it's a separate unrelated business that only have in common that they use servers.
It's like to say MS has an advantage in gaming because they have Excel and Excel runs in computers, like the game engines and tools that devs use to make games, and that some devs use Excel. That doesn't mean a shit for gamedevs, because whatever spreadsheet app they use or where do they have their servers stored, or to have another division in that business doesn't matter at all.
It would be like to say the same for Sony because they also make tvs and videogames use tvs to be played.
Offering server storage and an app (website) to manage them with some extra related services to other companies who may store them the servers of their website, app etc has nothing to do with cloud gaming. In this case it only saves MS a few bucks of renting space for storing the server racks, but they still have to pay which is by far the biggest related costs: its internet bandwith and electricity + maintenance.
We have absolutely no data showing that Xcloud has more worldwide users than PS cloud gaming, we only know that PS Plus has twice the subs than GP and that worldwide Sony gaming subs generate way more money than MS gaming subs.
UK is a very small portion of the gaming market and console market, or even for Xbox and PS, so it isn't relevant to measure worldwide performance.
Cloud gaming started 20 years ago and its first 'important'/'relevant' player Gaikai for the modern cloud gaming -who filled some of the patents being used today, now owned by Sony- started in the late 2000s.
During decades the market didn't highlly scaled because there are some reasons that prevent it from scaling, that even if slightly improved since then and will continue slightly improving the main reasons will continue avoiding it to scale and become mainstream worldwide during at least a decade or two: the need of a technology available worldwide that allows enough speed and low enough latency plus also not blocked by internet data caps. Even the 6G experiments we're seeing, which will take a lot of time to have a great worldwide coverage (4G still doesn't have it).
So cloud gaming will continue being an irrelevant market as is today, at least for decades. So it's very hard to justify being corcerned about it.
And as I mentioned ABK only has a 4% market share, so its acquisition shoudn't be a concern regarding consolidation, specially when who buys it has only single digit market share and isn't at all a market leader in the main markets (mobile, PC and console), in fact in the platform more attached to cloud gaming it's the last one in the race and around 90% of the active players of their direct competitor don't buy the game that is causing the concern.
I suggest you to at least go to wikipedia to know what these terms means, because I see you don't know it.
Yes, they are almost as irrelevant as the Azure market position when talking about gaming or cloud gaming.
Yep, you can read a preview on Google Books: "Halo: The Official Cookbook - Recipes from across the galaxy". One of the most interesting Xbox releases combined with the Xbox nail polish, the Xbox Series X fridge, and Xbox Series S toaster. It would be interesting to sell them together in a bundle.